Re: Request GEODE-7510/GEODE-7538 be cherry-picked into release 1.11

2019-12-11 Thread Jason Huynh
I believe we'll have to cherry-pick 1448c83c2a910b2891b4c13f1b4cbed2920252de across. Unfortunately it went in as a merge (there was a hiccup on squash and merge where the try-again didn't do a squash merge :-(. On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:30 AM Mark Hanson wrote: > Can I get the SHA of the co

Re: Request GEODE-7510/GEODE-7538 be cherry-picked into release 1.11

2019-12-11 Thread Mark Hanson
Can I get the SHA of the commit? Thanks, Mark > On Dec 11, 2019, at 11:02 AM, Jason Huynh wrote: > > Hello, > > GEODE-7538 was highlighted as blocking the 1.11 release. This has now been > addressed and propose that this gets merged over to release 1.11. > > This issue solves a few things, m

Request GEODE-7510/GEODE-7538 be cherry-picked into release 1.11

2019-12-11 Thread Jason Huynh
Hello, GEODE-7538 was highlighted as blocking the 1.11 release. This has now been addressed and propose that this gets merged over to release 1.11. This issue solves a few things, most notably: GEODE-7510 shows inconsistency between secondaries and primaries. GEODE-7538 showed operations not co