lberto
From: Jacob Barrett mailto:jabarr...@vmware.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 7:44 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org<mailto:dev@geode.apache.org>
mailto:dev@geode.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: Remove WAN TX Batching Serialization Changes
On Sep 22, 2021, at
No worries, Jake.
The steps you are proposing sound good to me. Let me know if I can be of any
help.
Alberto
From: Jacob Barrett
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 7:44 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: Remove WAN TX Batching Serialization
> On Sep 22, 2021, at 12:31 AM, Alberto Gomez wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Jake, why do you say the feature is not complete in 1.14.0? In my view, it
> works as it was designed and as documented.
Sorry, I was misinformed and misjudge the state. I meant no disrespect.
> I do not think it makes sense
Hi,
Jake, why do you say the feature is not complete in 1.14.0? In my view, it
works as it was designed and as documented.
I do not think it makes sense to remove a feature shipped in the 1.14.0 release
that customers might already be using.
If the urgent issue to solve is the unnecessary seri
> On Sep 21, 2021, at 2:32 PM, Anilkumar Gingade wrote:
> Is the idea just creating the Jira tickets? It is not clear from here, if it
> will be owned and completed by 1.15.
I will create two tickets:
1) To address 1.14 and anyone can pick this up, but if nobody does I will.
2) To block 1.15
+1.
Is the idea just creating the Jira tickets? It is not clear from here, if it
will be owned and completed by 1.15.
-Anil.
On 9/21/21, 2:13 PM, "Jacob Barrett" wrote:
Devs,
In addition to my discussion regarding the modularization of the WAN TX
batching implementation I would lik
