For closure this has been cherry-picked into support/1.13.
Thanks,
Jake
> On May 11, 2020, at 10:47 AM, Dave Barnes wrote:
>
> Plenty of votes, go ahead, Jake, and add this to the support/1.13 branch.
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 8:36 AM Joris Melchior wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
Plenty of votes, go ahead, Jake, and add this to the support/1.13 branch.
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 8:36 AM Joris Melchior wrote:
> +1
>
> From: Jacob Barrett
> Sent: May 8, 2020 21:26
> To: dev@geode.apache.org
> Subject: Discussion - Change Public API Before In
+1
From: Jacob Barrett
Sent: May 8, 2020 21:26
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Discussion - Change Public API Before Initial Release
Hey Ya’ll,
We have a new API going into 1.13 that has an inconsistency I want to address
before we are stuck with it. The clas
+1
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 11:03 PM Dick Cavender wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 7:59 PM Owen Nichols wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > > On May 8, 2020, at 7:57 PM, Robert Houghton
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 8, 2020, 18:26 Jacob Barrett wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hey Ya’ll,
> >
+1
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 7:59 PM Owen Nichols wrote:
> +1
>
> > On May 8, 2020, at 7:57 PM, Robert Houghton
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, May 8, 2020, 18:26 Jacob Barrett wrote:
> >
> >> Hey Ya’ll,
> >>
> >> We have a new API going into 1.13 that has an inconsistency I want to
> >> addr
+1
> On May 8, 2020, at 7:57 PM, Robert Houghton wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2020, 18:26 Jacob Barrett wrote:
>
>> Hey Ya’ll,
>>
>> We have a new API going into 1.13 that has an inconsistency I want to
>> address before we are stuck with it. The class SniSocketFactory should be
>> renam
+1
On Fri, May 8, 2020, 18:26 Jacob Barrett wrote:
> Hey Ya’ll,
>
> We have a new API going into 1.13 that has an inconsistency I want to
> address before we are stuck with it. The class SniSocketFactory should be
> renamed SniProxySocketFactory. The class in question produces objects of
> type
