John, I 100% agree with your statements!
We should add that to the list as well...
On 11/28/18 11:54, John Blum wrote:
1 more thing...
Yes, CORRECTNESS is not going to be the glamorous thing. You cannot market
it because it is not sexy, not cool, it is simply expected as the bar to
entry. No
I think the most recent conversations that come to mind are:
* DLQ for WAN Gateways
* A current discussion about a bug regarding Tombstones, Entry removal
and client/server inconsistencies.
All I am pointing out is, if one is working on any feature or bug and
there is any doubt about direc
Can you provide examples of discussion you believe violate there tenants?
> On Nov 28, 2018, at 11:12 AM, Udo Kohlmeyer wrote:
>
> Hi there Geode dev's.
>
> I'm starting to notice more and more discussions about proposed features or
> JIRA tickets, where imo, core Geode tenets are being violat
1 more thing...
Yes, CORRECTNESS is not going to be the glamorous thing. You cannot market
it because it is not sexy, not cool, it is simply expected as the bar to
entry. No one notices when the system just works as it should. You will
not get compliments, no thank you's. It's just "Business A
There is only 1 thing I would add to this list is, above all others...
1. Correctness
Of course, this ought to go without saying, but do the right thing, always,
even at the peril of all the other things combined. It is all too easy to
focus on the shinny things (e.g. performance, latency, high
