Re: C++ Style

2017-02-23 Thread Ernest Burghardt
Just looking a new PR and we have a BUNCH of m_memberVariables... so if we choose that transformation we'll probably touch 99% of the files #funfact On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Ernest Burghardt wrote: > +1 for camelCase - not a fan of allowed (not as readable) or > under_scores(requires ext

Re: C++ Style

2017-02-22 Thread Ernest Burghardt
+1 for camelCase - not a fan of allowed (not as readable) or under_scores(requires extra keying/shift) -1 for variable decoration regardless of scope +1 for const refs and I'm good with the pointers too, I think that tends to work itself out with modern design patterns (in my experience) *Preinc

Re: C++ Style

2017-02-21 Thread Michael William Dodge
* Variable Naming - I agree that lowercase-first camelCase is more readable and preferable for variable and data member names. Since class names are uppercase-first CamelCase, underscores should not be used. And alllowercase is unreadable. * Class Data Members - Any sort of Hungarian notation,