The PRs to remove this module have been approved merged - from geode,
geode-benchmarks, and geode-examples.
-Dan
From: Dan Smith
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 2:06 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] Future of the geode-redis module
Since it
From: Alexander Murmann
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 11:04 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] Future of the geode-redis module
Hi Donal,
I think Dan, Ray or Jens were going to issue a PR in the next few days that
would remove the experimental Redis functionality. Given this is not
. Especially, given that the
discussion here seemed very non-controversial.
From: Donal Evans
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 09:28
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] Future of the geode-redis module
It's been almost a month since this discussion was st
It's been almost a month since this discussion was started, and all the
responses have been supportive of the idea. Is this still something that the
Geode community intends to do? Should there be a [vote] email sent out to
confirm this course of action?
From: Ale
rsday, April 14, 2022 at 9:10 PM
> To: dev@geode.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [discuss] Future of the geode-redis module
> I agree with this proposal.
>
> As someone who has contributed a great deal of time and effort to the
> geode-for-redis module in the past year or so, it's
: Thursday, April 14, 2022 at 9:10 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] Future of the geode-redis module
I agree with this proposal.
As someone who has contributed a great deal of time and effort to the
geode-for-redis module in the past year or so, it's sad to see it go, but
realisti
I agree with this proposal.
As someone who has contributed a great deal of time and effort to the
geode-for-redis module in the past year or so, it's sad to see it go, but
realistically, the last thing that Geode needs is more unmaintained code. Our
track record for removing dead or deprecated
