Based on some other recent discussions about the Redis adaptor, I would
agree this makes sense.
I don't believe its usage has been well tested or proven yet by its
intended audience.
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Galen M O'Sullivan
wrote:
> I'm going to go ahead and do this tomorrow if there
I'm going to go ahead and do this tomorrow if there are no objections.
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
> +1 for marking it experimental and going ahead with changing it.
>
> -Dan
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Michael Stolz wrote:
>
>> +1 to marking it experimental now
>>
+1. Good to know. I was just talking to a potential customer this morning
that’s intent on replacing voldemort with an IMDG and wanting to merge whatever
solution with their current Redis use cases. If its not ready I want to make
sure I’m not giving bad information.
Wayne Lund
Advisory Pla
+1 for marking it experimental and going ahead with changing it.
-Dan
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Michael Stolz wrote:
> +1 to marking it experimental now
>
> Once we do that I think it will be fine for the community to make breaking
> changes to it if we need to.
>
> --
> Mike Stolz
> Prin
+1 to marking it experimental now
Once we do that I think it will be fine for the community to make breaking
changes to it if we need to.
--
Mike Stolz
Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager
Mobile: +1-631-835-4771
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Galen M O'Sullivan
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I
