Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0 RC1

2018-03-23 Thread Swapnil Bawaskar
This vote is now cancelled. Based on the comments, I will cut a new RC when we have fixes for GEODE-4913 and GEODE-4787. On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 3:11 PM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > -1 Due to the regression in functionality. GEODE-4913 > > @John, I agree, GEODE-4787 should be addressed with priority

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0 RC1

2018-03-23 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
-1 Due to the regression in functionality. GEODE-4913 @John, I agree, GEODE-4787 should be addressed with priority. --Udo On 3/23/18 15:04, John Blum wrote: The same could be said of GEODE-4787. On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: Thanks for catching this Diane. I agree;

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0 RC1

2018-03-23 Thread John Blum
The same could be said of GEODE-4787. On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: > Thanks for catching this Diane. I agree; we shouldn't break something that > used to work. > > Anthony > > > On Mar 23, 2018, at 11:27 AM, Diane Hardman wrote: > > -1 > I filed GEODE-4913 based on scr

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0 RC1

2018-03-23 Thread Anthony Baker
Thanks for catching this Diane. I agree; we shouldn't break something that used to work. Anthony On Mar 23, 2018, at 11:27 AM, Diane Hardman wrote: -1 I filed GEODE-4913 based on scripts I have that create 2 clusters connected by a WAN gateway on my local machine. *Problem*: we are opening a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0 RC1

2018-03-23 Thread Diane Hardman
-1 I filed GEODE-4913 based on scripts I have that create 2 clusters connected by a WAN gateway on my local machine. *Problem*: we are opening a cache-server on default port (40404) irrespective of the fact that one is explicitly specified in cache.xml. *symptoms*: users who start more than one Geo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0 RC1

2018-03-21 Thread Dan Smith
+1 Run geode-release-check. Verified no MD5 files in the distribution. -Dan On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:57 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > +1 > > - verified signatures and checksums > - checked source release for binaries > - basic gfsh testing > - ran all the examples > > Anthony > > > On Mar 20, 2

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0 RC1

2018-03-21 Thread Anthony Baker
+1 - verified signatures and checksums - checked source release for binaries - basic gfsh testing - ran all the examples Anthony > On Mar 20, 2018, at 3:09 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > > This is the first release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.5.0. > Thanks to all the community members

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0 RC1

2018-03-21 Thread Anthony Baker
Yep, the build inserts the username (in this case the release manager) into the version properties file. Anthony > On Mar 21, 2018, at 10:20 AM, Jens Deppe wrote: > > Is it normal for the build id to contain an actual username. As in: > > Build-Date: 2018-03-20 11:43:49 -0700 > Build-Id: *

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0 RC1

2018-03-21 Thread Jens Deppe
Is it normal for the build id to contain an actual username. As in: Build-Date: 2018-03-20 11:43:49 -0700 Build-Id: *sbawaskar* 0 Build-Java-Version: 1.8.0_121 Build-Platform: Mac OS X 10.13.3 x86_64 Product-Name: Apache Geode Product-Version: 1.5.0 Source-Date: 2018-03-19 10:31:04 -

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0 RC1

2018-03-21 Thread Dave Barnes
+1 User Guide builds correctly from source, javadocs look up-to-date On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 8:27 AM, Jens Deppe wrote: > +1 - basic gfsh functionality looks good on Windows. > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > > md5 generation is already removed from geode, just need

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0 RC1

2018-03-21 Thread Jens Deppe
+1 - basic gfsh functionality looks good on Windows. On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: > md5 generation is already removed from geode, just need to do this for > geode-examples. > > Anthony > > > > On Mar 20, 2018, at 3:30 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar > wrote: > > > > Removed! > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0 RC1

2018-03-20 Thread Anthony Baker
md5 generation is already removed from geode, just need to do this for geode-examples. Anthony > On Mar 20, 2018, at 3:30 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > > Removed! > > I also filed a JIRA to not generate the md5 checksum file going forward: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-4903 >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0 RC1

2018-03-20 Thread Anthony Baker
The release dir looked fine to me. Were you looking at maven? Those are automatically generated during the upload and we don’t have explicit control over them. I’ve spent hours just trying to get rid of the hash files for the signatures :( Anthony > On Mar 20, 2018, at 3:18 PM, Dan Smith

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0 RC1

2018-03-20 Thread Swapnil Bawaskar
Removed! I also filed a JIRA to not generate the md5 checksum file going forward: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-4903 On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 3:18 PM Dan Smith wrote: > It looks like we are still generating .md5 files. That doesn't necessarily > need to hold up this release (you co

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0 RC1

2018-03-20 Thread Dan Smith
It looks like we are still generating .md5 files. That doesn't necessarily need to hold up this release (you could just delete them from SVN), but we're not supposed to be distributing .md5 files anymore. http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums -Dan On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 3