Re: [Proposal] Geode Native Library Versioning

2021-03-02 Thread Jacob Barrett
ght need to work on > the testing approach. > > BR/ > Mario. > > From: Jacob Barrett > Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 4:34 PM > To: dev@geode.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Proposal] Geode Native Library Versioning > > > On Jan 29, 2021, at

Re: [Proposal] Geode Native Library Versioning

2021-02-02 Thread Mario Salazar de Torres
of virtual methods we might need to work on the testing approach. BR/ Mario. From: Jacob Barrett Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 4:34 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [Proposal] Geode Native Library Versioning On Jan 29, 2021, at 3:47 PM, Dan Smith m

Re: [Proposal] Geode Native Library Versioning

2021-02-01 Thread Jacob Barrett
On Jan 29, 2021, at 3:47 PM, Dan Smith mailto:dasm...@vmware.com>> wrote: I do think at least implementing some automated checking for whatever compatibility we intend to provide is a good idea. I have a branch with a test using Abigail [1]. This branch depends on merging of a CI branch. It w

Re: [Proposal] Geode Native Library Versioning

2021-01-29 Thread Dan Smith
From: Jacob Barrett Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 12:00 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [Proposal] Geode Native Library Versioning ** sorry for the trashed formatting originally ** I would appreciate some feedback on this proposal by the end of day Friday, February 5th, 2021. TLDR

Re: [Proposal] Geode Native Library Versioning

2021-01-29 Thread Jacob Barrett
** sorry for the trashed formatting originally ** I would appreciate some feedback on this proposal by the end of day Friday, February 5th, 2021. TLDR; The proposal is to formalize what has been effectively the status quo for Geode Native release in the current source form and any future binar