Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-6564 to support/1.13

2020-08-03 Thread Dave Barnes
Go ahead and back-port, Darrel. Thanks for your contribution. On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 4:51 PM Alexander Murmann wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 4:47 PM Jianxia Chen wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 4:13 PM Darrel Schneider > wrote: > > > > > GEODE-6564 is a memory leak that

Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-6564 to support/1.13

2020-08-03 Thread Alexander Murmann
+1 On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 4:47 PM Jianxia Chen wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 4:13 PM Darrel Schneider wrote: > > > GEODE-6564 is a memory leak that has impacted users so it would be good > to > > have it in 1.13. It has a simple, low risk, fix. > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-6564 to support/1.13

2020-08-03 Thread Jianxia Chen
+1 On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 4:13 PM Darrel Schneider wrote: > GEODE-6564 is a memory leak that has impacted users so it would be good to > have it in 1.13. It has a simple, low risk, fix. >

Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-6564 to support/1.13

2020-08-03 Thread Donal Evans
+1 From: Darrel Schneider Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 4:05 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-6564 to support/1.13 GEODE-6564 is a memory leak that has impacted users so it would be good to have it in 1.13. It has a simple, low risk,