Re: [PROPOASAL] backport GEODE-8144

2020-05-28 Thread Bill Burcham
+1 On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 11:49 AM Ernie Burghardt wrote: > +1 > > On 5/27/20, 1:35 PM, "Bruce Schuchardt" wrote: > > This ticket has two PRs. One passed all normal CI runs but then we > hit a faulty test that failed on a Windows machine. There’s a new PR that > fixes that test & has be

Re: [PROPOASAL] backport GEODE-8144

2020-05-28 Thread Ernie Burghardt
+1 On 5/27/20, 1:35 PM, "Bruce Schuchardt" wrote: This ticket has two PRs. One passed all normal CI runs but then we hit a faulty test that failed on a Windows machine. There’s a new PR that fixes that test & has been merged. The PRs fixe endpoint verification problems in servers a

Re: [PROPOASAL] backport GEODE-8144

2020-05-28 Thread Dave Barnes
I'm going to spend a release-manager +1 to put this proposal over the top. Please merge this fix into support/1.13, Bruce. Thanks, Dave On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 7:52 AM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > +1 > On May 27, 2020, 1:35 PM -0700, Bruce Schuchardt , > wrote: > This ticket has two PRs. One passed al

Re: [PROPOASAL] backport GEODE-8144

2020-05-28 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
+1 On May 27, 2020, 1:35 PM -0700, Bruce Schuchardt , wrote: This ticket has two PRs. One passed all normal CI runs but then we hit a faulty test that failed on a Windows machine. There’s a new PR that fixes that test & has been merged. The PRs fixe endpoint verification problems in servers and

Re: [PROPOASAL] backport GEODE-8144

2020-05-28 Thread Joris Melchior
+1 From: Bruce Schuchardt Sent: May 27, 2020 16:35 To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: [PROPOASAL] backport GEODE-8144 This ticket has two PRs. One passed all normal CI runs but then we hit a faulty test that failed on a Windows machine. There’s a new PR that fi