Thanks Juan!
I will check it.
Alberto
From: Ju@N
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 7:46 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question about gateway sender stopped and memory consumption
I recall some discussion about this in the past, there even was an &quo
overflown.
Ideally it should be backed up in a queue that does not use any memory.
Best regards,
Alberto
From: Kirk Lund
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 7:41 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question about gateway sender stopped and memory consumption
I
I recall some discussion about this in the past, there even was an "RFC"
that never got implemented:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=80452478.
Best regards.
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 18:41, Kirk Lund wrote:
> I would have expected unsent events to be stored in a queu
I would have expected unsent events to be stored in a queue that is backed
by a persistent region or something on disk. If that's not currently true,
then it seems like a good direction might be to make tmpDroppedEvents use a
durable queue of some sort that overflows to disk.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020
Hi,
We have observed that when a gateway sender is stopped in a site, all the
events received while it is stopped are stored in the
'AbstractGatewaySender.tmpDroppedEvents' queue of the primary sender. The
elements of this queue are not removed from this queue until the sender is
started back
