Go ahead, Patrick, and add this to 1.13.
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 8:36 AM Joris Melchior wrote:
> +1
>
> From: Patrick Johnson
> Sent: May 8, 2020 17:40
> To: dev@geode.apache.org
> Subject: Proposal to bring GEODE-8068 to support/1.13
>
+1
From: Patrick Johnson
Sent: May 8, 2020 17:40
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Proposal to bring GEODE-8068 to support/1.13
I’d like to bring GEODE-8068 to support/1.13. This commit reverts two prior
commits (GEODE-8033 and GEODE-8044). GEODE-8033 and GEODE
+1
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 2:52 PM Owen Nichols wrote:
> +1
>
> Redis work is still marked @Experimental, but since this was reverted on
> develop just after the branch cut, it makes sense to revert from
> support/1.13 as well.
>
> > On May 8, 2020, at 2:40 PM, Patrick Johnson wrote:
> >
> > I’d
+1
Redis work is still marked @Experimental, but since this was reverted on
develop just after the branch cut, it makes sense to revert from support/1.13
as well.
> On May 8, 2020, at 2:40 PM, Patrick Johnson wrote:
>
> I’d like to bring GEODE-8068 to support/1.13. This commit reverts two pri
I’d like to bring GEODE-8068 to support/1.13. This commit reverts two prior
commits (GEODE-8033 and GEODE-8044). GEODE-8033 and GEODE-8044 introduced an
experimental feature that is useless in its current state and has already been
redesigned, so there is no reason for it to go out with 1.13.
R
