Re: Locators with --bind-address

2017-02-24 Thread Anilkumar Gingade
Other reasons: one could run multiple locators, and designate one for client connection and other for jmx. -Anil. On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Galen M O'Sullivan wrote: > I can see that you might want to configure them separately, so it's good to > have both options. > > If I was to design

Re: Locators with --bind-address

2017-02-24 Thread Galen M O'Sullivan
I can see that you might want to configure them separately, so it's good to have both options. If I was to design this again, I think I would have the JMX address etc. default to the same as the bind address, but as it is that would break backwards compatibility. -Galen On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1

Re: Locators with --bind-address

2017-02-24 Thread Anilkumar Gingade
I believe they need to be separate, which helps to provide better control over application connection (who can connect to what)... They should all have default bind address, right? -Anil. On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Kevin Duling wrote: > When starting a locator, gfsh has the --bind-addr

Locators with --bind-address

2017-02-24 Thread Kevin Duling
When starting a locator, gfsh has the --bind-address option to tie to a particular NIC. E.g., start locator --name=loc-sec --security-properties-file=./security.properties --classpath=/Users/kduling/gfsh-security --bind-address=localhost This address is the one the server uses to connect with.