+1 to improve gfsh and use jackson consistently for all our json parsing
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Patrick Rhomberg
wrote:
> I was under the impression that gfsh console output was intended as a more
> "active" interface with an operator. To that end, improved usability and a
> more consi
I was under the impression that gfsh console output was intended as a more
"active" interface with an operator. To that end, improved usability and a
more consistent output sounds like a boon to me.
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Jens Deppe wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm working on removing our depe
Hi All,
I'm working on removing our dependency on geode-json (org.json) in favor of
Jackson. Initially this work has revolved around refactoring the internal
results from gfsh commands (nothing that is user-visible).
I'm now looking at the various gfsh 'data' commands (get, put, query and
locate)
