Hi Naba!
Did you manage to comment this topic with some engineers?
Cheers,
/Alberto G.
From: Nabarun Nag
Sent: Friday, June 5, 2020 11:00 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: About Geode rolling downgrade
Hi Mario and Alberto,
I will sync up with couple
shutdown the new version DS. Now we have a DS
with lower version.
Regards
Naba
From: Mario Ivanac
Sent: Friday, June 5, 2020 1:19:42 AM
To: geode
Subject: Odg: About Geode rolling downgrade
Hi all,
just a reminder that Alberto is still waiting for feedback
Hi all,
just a reminder that Alberto is still waiting for feedback,
regarding his question.
BR,
Mario
Šalje: Alberto Gomez
Poslano: 14. svibnja 2020. 14:45
Prima: geode
Predmet: Re: About Geode rolling downgrade
Hi,
I friendly reminder to the community about
Hi,
I friendly reminder to the community about this request for feedback.
Thanks,
-Alberto G.
From: Alberto Gomez
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 10:44 AM
To: geode
Subject: Re: About Geode rolling downgrade
Hi again,
Considering Geode does not support online
if
it holds in this rollback case.
Best regards,
-Alberto G.
From: Anilkumar Gingade
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 12:59 AM
To: geode
Subject: Re: About Geode rolling downgrade
That's right, most/always no down-time requirement is managed by h
That's right, most/always no down-time requirement is managed by having
replicated cluster setups (Disaster-recovery/backup site). The data is
either pushed to both systems through the data ingesters or by using WAN
setup.
The clusters are upgraded one at a time. If there is a failure during
upgrad
Anil, let me see if I understand your perspective by stating it this way:
If cases where 100% uptime is a requirement, users are almost always running a
disaster recovery site. It could be active/active or active/standby but there
are already at least 2 clusters with current copies of the data.
ped for
> the
> > rolling upgrade.
> >
> > Anyhow, we wonder what would be as of today the recommended or official
> > way to downgrade a Geode system without downtime and data loss?
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Bruce Schuchard
) will have been developed for the
> rolling upgrade.
>
> Anyhow, we wonder what would be as of today the recommended or official
> way to downgrade a Geode system without downtime and data loss?
>
>
>
> From: Bruce Schuchardt
> Sent: Frid
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 11:36 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: About Geode rolling downgrade
Hi Alberto,
I think that if we want to support limited rolling downgrade some other version
interchange needs to be done and there need to be tests that prove
y.
-Alberto
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 5:04 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: About Geode rolling downgrade
-1
Another reason that we should not support rolling downgrade is that it
ma
Geode rolling downgrade
-1
Another reason that we should not support rolling downgrade is that it makes it
impossible to upgrade distributed algorithms.
When we added rolling upgrade support we pretty much immediately ran into a
distributed hang when a test started a Locator using an older version
-1
Another reason that we should not support rolling downgrade is that it makes it
impossible to upgrade distributed algorithms.
When we added rolling upgrade support we pretty much immediately ran into a
distributed hang when a test started a Locator using an older version. In that
release w
Hi,
Some months ago I posted a question on this list (see [1]) about the
possibility of supporting "rolling downgrade" in Geode in order to downgrade a
Geode system to an older version, similar to the "rolling upgrade" currently
supported.
With your answers and my investigations my conclusion w
14 matches
Mail list logo
