Based on some other recent discussions about the Redis adaptor, I would
agree this makes sense.
I don't believe its usage has been well tested or proven yet by its
intended audience.
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Galen M O'Sullivan
wrote:
> I'm going to go ahead and do this tomorrow if there
I'm going to go ahead and do this tomorrow if there are no objections.
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
> +1 for marking it experimental and going ahead with changing it.
>
> -Dan
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Michael Stolz wrote:
>
>> +1 to marking it experimental now
>>
+1. Good to know. I was just talking to a potential customer this morning
that’s intent on replacing voldemort with an IMDG and wanting to merge whatever
solution with their current Redis use cases. If its not ready I want to make
sure I’m not giving bad information.
Wayne Lund
Advisory Pla
+1 for marking it experimental and going ahead with changing it.
-Dan
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Michael Stolz wrote:
> +1 to marking it experimental now
>
> Once we do that I think it will be fine for the community to make breaking
> changes to it if we need to.
>
> --
> Mike Stolz
> Prin
+1 to marking it experimental now
Once we do that I think it will be fine for the community to make breaking
changes to it if we need to.
--
Mike Stolz
Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager
Mobile: +1-631-835-4771
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Galen M O'Sullivan
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I
Hi all,
I think that we should mark the Redis adapter as experimental. This
functionality comes from the initial code grant from GemFire. It is
mentioned in the "Experimental" section of the GemFire docs [1], and as far
as I can tell, the only reason it hasn't been marked as experimental in
Geode
