Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-8886 to 1.14

2021-03-08 Thread Kirk Lund
+1 On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 3:58 PM Owen Nichols wrote: > Added to blocker board, thanks > > On 3/5/21, 3:15 PM, "Jianxia Chen" wrote: > > +1 > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 2:48 PM Mark Hanson wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > It was discovered that there was a bug with unprocessed e

Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-8886 to 1.14

2021-03-05 Thread Owen Nichols
Added to blocker board, thanks On 3/5/21, 3:15 PM, "Jianxia Chen" wrote: +1 On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 2:48 PM Mark Hanson wrote: > Hi All, > > It was discovered that there was a bug with unprocessed events under > certain conditions with WAN specifically when old and new

Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-8886 to 1.14

2021-03-05 Thread Jianxia Chen
+1 On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 2:48 PM Mark Hanson wrote: > Hi All, > > It was discovered that there was a bug with unprocessed events under > certain conditions with WAN specifically when old and new servers are vying > for primary status. > This fix will alleviate the problem in 1.14. The code that

Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-8886 to 1.14

2021-03-05 Thread Darrel Schneider
+1 From: Mark Hanson Sent: Friday, March 5, 2021 2:48 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-8886 to 1.14 Hi All, It was discovered that there was a bug with unprocessed events under certain conditions with WAN specifically when old and

[Proposal] Backport GEODE-8886 to 1.14

2021-03-05 Thread Mark Hanson
Hi All, It was discovered that there was a bug with unprocessed events under certain conditions with WAN specifically when old and new servers are vying for primary status. This fix will alleviate the problem in 1.14. The code that caused the problem is present in 1.14, hence the backport reque