Re: [PROPOSAL] bring GEODE-8131 PR to support branches

2020-05-20 Thread Dave Barnes
We have a quorum, Bruce, so go ahead and add this fix to 1.13 and other support branches, as appropriate. Thanks, Dave On 2020/05/19 15:53:28, Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > While investigating a distributed hang we discovered that the alerting system > was blocking the logging of critical informat

Re: [PROPOSAL] bring GEODE-8131 PR to support branches

2020-05-20 Thread Joris Melchior
+1 From: Bruce Schuchardt Sent: May 19, 2020 11:53 To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: [PROPOSAL] bring GEODE-8131 PR to support branches While investigating a distributed hang we discovered that the alerting system was blocking the logging of critical

Re: [PROPOSAL] bring GEODE-8131 PR to support branches

2020-05-19 Thread Jinmei Liao
+1 On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:05 AM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > +1 > On May 19, 2020, 8:53 AM -0700, Bruce Schuchardt , > wrote: > While investigating a distributed hang we discovered that the alerting > system was blocking the logging of critical information that would have > helped diagnose the iss

Re: [PROPOSAL] bring GEODE-8131 PR to support branches

2020-05-19 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
+1 On May 19, 2020, 8:53 AM -0700, Bruce Schuchardt , wrote: While investigating a distributed hang we discovered that the alerting system was blocking the logging of critical information that would have helped diagnose the issue. This PR modifies the logging of this information to first log i

[PROPOSAL] bring GEODE-8131 PR to support branches

2020-05-19 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
While investigating a distributed hang we discovered that the alerting system was blocking the logging of critical information that would have helped diagnose the issue.  This PR modifies the logging of this information to first log it at “info” level and then at “fatal” level so that in the fut