Re: [PROPOSAL]: Finer Grained Security When Invoking Methods in OQL

2018-06-25 Thread Juan José Ramos
Hello Dave, Thanks for the heads up, spelling errors fixed (at least that one :-/). Cheers!. On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 4:34 PM Dave Barnes wrote: > Juan, > Nice work - you've obviously given this plenty of thought. I'm not > qualified to comment on the technical aspects of your proposal, but as

Re: [PROPOSAL]: Finer Grained Security When Invoking Methods in OQL

2018-06-25 Thread Dave Barnes
Juan, Nice work - you've obviously given this plenty of thought. I'm not qualified to comment on the technical aspects of your proposal, but as a proofreader I noticed that there are a couple of occurrences of "invokation" that should be spelled "invocation". Dave On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:52 AM

[PROPOSAL]: Finer Grained Security When Invoking Methods in OQL

2018-06-25 Thread Ju@N
Hello all, The current approach used to authorize methods during OQL execution seems to be way too restrictive, I've drafted a proposal to change the current behavior and allow further customization: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Customizable+Security+When+Invoking+Methods+in+O