Ok I’m calling this one closed. We are going to drop the exceptions map and
change the function to return the entry map only.
> On Oct 23, 2017, at 11:53 AM, Mark Hanson wrote:
>
> +1 for dropping the exceptions map.
>> On Oct 23, 2017, at 10:36 AM, Ernest Burghardt wrote:
>>
>> +1 drop excep
+1 for dropping the exceptions map.
> On Oct 23, 2017, at 10:36 AM, Ernest Burghardt wrote:
>
> +1 drop exceptions map
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Michael William Dodge
> wrote:
>
>> +1 for dropping the exceptions map for symmetry with the Java API
>>
>> Sarge
>>
>>> On 23 Oct, 201
+1 drop exceptions map
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Michael William Dodge
wrote:
> +1 for dropping the exceptions map for symmetry with the Java API
>
> Sarge
>
> > On 23 Oct, 2017, at 09:32, Jacob Barrett wrote:
> >
> > As part of our decision to replace all function out variables with re
+1 for dropping the exceptions map for symmetry with the Java API
Sarge
> On 23 Oct, 2017, at 09:32, Jacob Barrett wrote:
>
> As part of our decision to replace all function out variables with return
> values we ran into an interesting function with Region::getAll. That
> function had two out v
As part of our decision to replace all function out variables with return
values we ran into an interesting function with Region::getAll. That
function had two out variables, one the map of key/value pairs and another
map for key/exception pairs. There are no tests that actually test the
key/except
