Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

+1 Yes! SBDG needs the Apache Geode 1.9.1 release with the Logging changes if you want to see Apache Geode on *Spring Initializer*. The Logging issues are impeding the presence of Apache Geode on *Initializer* at start.spring.io. On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 4:48 PM Anthony Baker wrote: > I think

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

I think it makes sense to do a 1.9.1 release for the same reasons that we proposed it originally. It looks like we all missed the VOTE thread (it was on my // todo list).In the past when we’ve had insufficient votes, we've extended the deadline and asked for help reviewing the release. Ant

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

+1 for log4j changes etc. Mark

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

Let's reopen the vote! On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 1:49 PM Kirk Lund wrote: > Do folks actually want a 1.9.1 release? > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 1:38 PM Owen Nichols wrote: > >> The VOTE for 1.9.1.RC1 failed due to lack of quorum, so re-opening this >> thread to continue the discussion. >> >> Is t

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

Do folks actually want a 1.9.1 release? On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 1:38 PM Owen Nichols wrote: > The VOTE for 1.9.1.RC1 failed due to lack of quorum, so re-opening this > thread to continue the discussion. > > Is there still a need for a 1.9 patch release (especially given that > 1.10.0.RC1 is expe

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

The VOTE for 1.9.1.RC1 failed due to lack of quorum, so re-opening this thread to continue the discussion. Is there still a need for a 1.9 patch release (especially given that 1.10.0.RC1 is expected later this week)? If so, perhaps we should back up a step or two and first: 1) come to rough con

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

I'll update the docs: - Geode user guide - Geode API docs - Native client user guide - Native client API docs - Apache Geode website On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 9:26 AM Owen Nichols wrote: > I will pair with you on a 1.9.1 release. > > > On Aug 19, 2019, at 9:23 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: > > > > I

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

I will pair with you on a 1.9.1 release. > On Aug 19, 2019, at 9:23 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: > > I volunteer to pair with a more experienced release manager for 1.9.1. > Anyone willing to mentor me on this? > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 7:53 AM Anthony Baker wrote: > >> Yep. Get a release manager,

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

I volunteer to pair with a more experienced release manager for 1.9.1. Anyone willing to mentor me on this? On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 7:53 AM Anthony Baker wrote: > Yep. Get a release manager, identify and cherry pick all the changes, then > do the release. > > Anthony > > > On Aug 16, 2019, at 4:

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

Yep. Get a release manager, identify and cherry pick all the changes, then do the release. Anthony > On Aug 16, 2019, at 4:21 PM, Kirk Lund wrote: > > Does anyone know what the next step is? Do we need a release manager to > proceed? > >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 1:57 PM John Blum wrote: >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

Does anyone know what the next step is? Do we need a release manager to proceed? On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 1:57 PM John Blum wrote: > Sorry, corrections below... > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 1:54 PM John Blum wrote: > > > Stated slightly a different way... > > > > If *SBDG 1.2 *were to be (re)base

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

Sorry, corrections below... On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 1:54 PM John Blum wrote: > Stated slightly a different way... > > If *SBDG 1.2 *were to be (re)based on *Apache Geode 1.10* directly, then > it would *defy* the dependency on Apache Geode pulled in by SDG Moore/2.2 > (which is and can only be G

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

Stated slightly a different way... If *SBDG 1.2 *were to be (re)based on *Apache Geode 1.10* directly, then it would *defy* the dependency on Apache Geode pulled in by SDG Moore/2.2 (which is and can only be Geode 1.9) for which SBDG is also based, along with Spring Boot 2.2, which pulls in SD Moo

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

For clarification... 1. SBDG 1.1 is the "*current*" development line (on master [1]); SBDG 1.2 is *not* yet in

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

Thanks, Udo. +1 for doing a 1.9.1 patch release, assuming there is enough time for SBDG to include it in their 1.2.x line. - Aaron > On Aug 13, 2019, at 12:38 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > > No, 1.9.1 IS something we require. SBDG 1.2 CAN use 1.9.1, we'd have to wait > for SBDG 1.3 to use 1.10

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

No, 1.9.1 IS something we require. SBDG 1.2 CAN use 1.9.1, we'd have to wait for SBDG 1.3 to use 1.10 or 1.11 SBDG 1.3 is still a few months off, so maybe getting critical fixes in patch versions is required. On 8/13/19 11:26 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: Udo, Thanks for the info! Sounds like we shou

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

This would then imply a SBDG 1.2.1 to include Geode 1.9.1. On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:55 AM Anthony Baker wrote: > I think there’s value is doing a 1.9.1 patch release to support Spring > users. > > Anthony > > > > On Aug 13, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: > > > > Udo, Thanks for the info!

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

+1 On 8/13/19 11:55 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: I think there’s value is doing a 1.9.1 patch release to support Spring users. Anthony On Aug 13, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: Udo, Thanks for the info! Sounds like we shouldn't bother with Geode 1.9.1 then. If I'm misinterpreting what you

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

I think there’s value is doing a 1.9.1 patch release to support Spring users. Anthony > On Aug 13, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: > > Udo, Thanks for the info! Sounds like we shouldn't bother with Geode 1.9.1 > then. If I'm misinterpreting what you wrote, let me know. > > On Tue, Aug 13,

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

Udo, Thanks for the info! Sounds like we shouldn't bother with Geode 1.9.1 then. If I'm misinterpreting what you wrote, let me know. On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:36 AM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > The latest version of SBDG 1.2 is already in RC stage. Which means the > dependent Geode version cannot be

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

The latest version of SBDG 1.2 is already in RC stage. Which means the dependent Geode version cannot be changed any more. Currently SBDG 1.2 is based on Geode 1.9. This will not change. Patch versions to 1.9 are supported, but not changes to 1.10 or later. THUS, Once SBDG 1.3 (Neuman) is rel

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

Assuming Geode 1.10 is released with the three logging fixes in Kirk’s message, can the next GA release of Spring Boot Data Geode consume 1.10 instead of 1.9? Also, when would SBDG need this patch release by (whether we do a 1.9.1 release or 1.10 release)? - Aaron > On Aug 13, 2019, at 9:31 AM

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

If we release a 1.9.1 I'd like to include the SSL/NIO fix. Cluster SSL communications with conserve-sockets=false is currently broken in 1.9. On 8/13/19 9:25 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: I'd like to discuss if and how we can release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements. This is primarily to provide a

[DISCUSS] Release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements

I'd like to discuss if and how we can release Geode 1.9.1 with logging improvements. This is primarily to provide a patch release for Spring Data Geode and Spring Boot to ensure a smoother User experience out-of-the box. They have very near-future releases that need this as soon as possible. The s