+1
On 12/6/17 9:41 AM, Barry Oglesby wrote:
+1
Thanks,
Barry Oglesby
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Kirk Lund wrote:
+1
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
+1
-Dan
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Jason Huynh wrote:
This is a proposal to deprecate existing Hash Index
+1
Thanks,
Barry Oglesby
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Kirk Lund wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > -Dan
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Jason Huynh wrote:
> >
> > > This is a proposal to deprecate existing Hash Index and deprecate the
+1
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
> +1
>
> -Dan
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Jason Huynh wrote:
>
> > This is a proposal to deprecate existing Hash Index and deprecate the
> > create hash index apis.
> >
> >
> > Currently the Hash Index name causes confusion. It is not
+1
-Dan
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Jason Huynh wrote:
> This is a proposal to deprecate existing Hash Index and deprecate the
> create hash index apis.
>
>
> Currently the Hash Index name causes confusion. It is not a traditional
> hash look up index, but more of memory savings index. The
This is a proposal to deprecate existing Hash Index and deprecate the
create hash index apis.
Currently the Hash Index name causes confusion. It is not a traditional
hash look up index, but more of memory savings index. The index does not
store index keys in memory and must hash the keys every t