Experimental features are subject to change or removal. No guarantees are
made of backwards compatibility.
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 2:53 PM Donal Evans wrote:
> Looks good to me. Fixing broken implementation and providing reliable HA
> can only be a good thing. My only concern is the backwards com
Looks good to me. Fixing broken implementation and providing reliable HA
can only be a good thing. My only concern is the backwards compatibility
issue, but I don't know if we make any guarantees regarding that for
experimental features, so it may be a non-issue.
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 8:35 AM Ray
Just a quick nudge - we set a deadline for comments for tomorrow. Anyone
had a chance to look this over yet? Thanks!
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 2:09 PM Raymond Ingles wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The current Redis API support in Geode has been marked experimental for a
> couple years and has several bugs a
Hi all,
The current Redis API support in Geode has been marked experimental for a
couple years and has several bugs and inconsistencies compared to native
Redis. We created a RFC for updating the Geode Redis API support, to
address issues in the implementation, improve performance and add High
Ava
