Re: [DISCUSS/VOTE] Proposal to bring GEODE-7465 to release/1.11.0

2019-11-26 Thread Owen Nichols
Voting summary: +1: 8 0: 0 -1: 0 git cherry-pick -x e148cef9cb63eba283cf86bc490eb280023567ce completed on release/1.11.0. > On Nov 26, 2019, at 1:35 PM, Ivan Godwin wrote: > > +1 > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 1:31 PM Xiaojian Zhou wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:48 PM Joris

Re: [DISCUSS/VOTE] Proposal to bring GEODE-7465 to release/1.11.0

2019-11-26 Thread Ivan Godwin
+1 On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 1:31 PM Xiaojian Zhou wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:48 PM Joris Melchior > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 2:41 PM Jason Huynh wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 11:34 AM Anilkumar Gingade < > aging...@pivotal.io> > >

Re: [DISCUSS/VOTE] Proposal to bring GEODE-7465 to release/1.11.0

2019-11-26 Thread Xiaojian Zhou
+1 On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:48 PM Joris Melchior wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 2:41 PM Jason Huynh wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 11:34 AM Anilkumar Gingade > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 11:32 AM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > > > > > > > Thi

Re: [DISCUSS/VOTE] Proposal to bring GEODE-7465 to release/1.11.0

2019-11-26 Thread Joris Melchior
+1 On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 2:41 PM Jason Huynh wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 11:34 AM Anilkumar Gingade > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 11:32 AM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > > > > > This is no-brainer > > > > > > *+1* > > > > > > On 11/26/19 11:27 AM, Owen Nichols wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS/VOTE] Proposal to bring GEODE-7465 to release/1.11.0

2019-11-26 Thread Jason Huynh
+1 On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 11:34 AM Anilkumar Gingade wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 11:32 AM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > > > This is no-brainer > > > > *+1* > > > > On 11/26/19 11:27 AM, Owen Nichols wrote: > > > I would like to propose bringing “GEODE-7465: Set eventProcessor to > null >

Re: [DISCUSS/VOTE] Proposal to bring GEODE-7465 to release/1.11.0

2019-11-26 Thread Anilkumar Gingade
+1 On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 11:32 AM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > This is no-brainer > > *+1* > > On 11/26/19 11:27 AM, Owen Nichols wrote: > > I would like to propose bringing “GEODE-7465: Set eventProcessor to null > in serial AEQ when it is stopped” into the 1.11 release (necessitating an > RC4). >

Re: [DISCUSS/VOTE] Proposal to bring GEODE-7465 to release/1.11.0

2019-11-26 Thread Alexander Murmann
+1 On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 11:32 AM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > This is no-brainer > > *+1* > > On 11/26/19 11:27 AM, Owen Nichols wrote: > > I would like to propose bringing “GEODE-7465: Set eventProcessor to null > in serial AEQ when it is stopped” into the 1.11 release (necessitating an > RC4). >

Re: [DISCUSS/VOTE] Proposal to bring GEODE-7465 to release/1.11.0

2019-11-26 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
This is no-brainer *+1* On 11/26/19 11:27 AM, Owen Nichols wrote: I would like to propose bringing “GEODE-7465: Set eventProcessor to null in serial AEQ when it is stopped” into the 1.11 release (necessitating an RC4). Without the fix, a sequence of ordinary gfsh commands will leave the WAN

Re: [DISCUSS/VOTE] Proposal to bring GEODE-7465 to release/1.11.0

2019-11-26 Thread Dick Cavender
+1 On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 11:27 AM Owen Nichols wrote: > I would like to propose bringing “GEODE-7465: Set eventProcessor to null > in serial AEQ when it is stopped” into the 1.11 release (necessitating an > RC4). > > Without the fix, a sequence of ordinary gfsh commands will leave the WAN > ga

[DISCUSS/VOTE] Proposal to bring GEODE-7465 to release/1.11.0

2019-11-26 Thread Owen Nichols
I would like to propose bringing “GEODE-7465: Set eventProcessor to null in serial AEQ when it is stopped” into the 1.11 release (necessitating an RC4). Without the fix, a sequence of ordinary gfsh commands will leave the WAN gateway in an unrecoverable hung state: stop gateway-sender start gate