Pending PR reviews

Hi, The following PRs: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/7323 https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/7749 https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/7664 are waiting for review for some time. Could code owners review these PRs? Thanks, Mario

Odg: Pending review from some code owners for PRs

Hi, Friendly reminder about pending reviews of some code owners for these PRs. Thanks, Mario Šalje: Mario Ivanac Poslano: 20. svibnja 2022. 15:24 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Pending review from some code owners for PRs Hi, The following PRs: https

Pending review from some code owners for PRs

Hi, The following PRs: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/7323 https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/7667 https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/7515 https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/7664 have received some approvals from several code owners, but there are still some code owners' reviews

[PROPOSAL] RFC Introduce monitoring of async writer thread

Hi, I'd appreciate some more feedback on this published RFC about "Introduce monitoring of async writer thread": https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Introduce+monitoring+of+async+writer+thread Thanks in advance. Mario

Odg: Review for #7381 and #7347

/pull/7517 Thanks, Mario Šalje: Mario Ivanac Poslano: 6. travnja 2022. 11:09 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Odg: Review for #7381 and #7347 Hi all, just a reminder, please could someone review: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9484 PR: https

Odg: Review for #7381 and #7347

/pull/7517 Thanks, Mario Šalje: Mario Ivanac Poslano: 28. ožujka 2022. 12:09 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Review for #7381 and #7347 Hi all, please could someone review: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9484 PR: https://github.com/apache

Review for #7381 and #7347

Hi all, please could someone review: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9484 PR: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/7381 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10020 PR: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/7347 Thanks, Mario

Pending review from some code owners for PR linked to GEODE-9642 and GEODE-9809

Hi, The following PRs: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/6909 [https://opengraph.githubassets.com/270d2813ee93426a4627e111d3aeefb89ce4fd92cb103c8511325f1907ca7144/apache/geode/pull/6909] GEODE-9642: Wait for colocation completed at partitioned region

RFC Improve possible duplicate logic for secondary buckets in WAN

Hi geode dev, we have published new RFC "Improve possible duplicate logic for secondary buckets in WAN" https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Improve+possible+duplicate+logic+for+secondary+buckets+in+WAN If you have any questions and concerns, please add to the RFC. Thank you. Reg

RFC Improve data inconsistency in replicated regions

Hi geode dev, we have published new RFC "Improve data inconsistency in replicated regions" https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Improve+data+inconsistency+in+replicated+regions If you have any questions and concerns, please add to the RFC. Thank you. Regards, Mario

Odg: Odg: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement

Let's see if in that case they are willing to collaborate. Alberto ____ From: Mario Ivanac Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 11:28 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Odg: Odg: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement Hi, I think that we have problem that Darrel was suspi

Odg: Odg: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement

s, closing these sockets should clear up any unacknowledged messages, freeing up the thread. Anthony > On Apr 20, 2021, at 7:31 AM, Mario Ivanac wrote: > > Hi, > > after analysis, we assume that proxy at reception of packets, sends ACK on > TCP level, and after that moment proxy

Odg: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement

Hi, just reminding on this topic. BR, Mario Šalje: Mario Ivanac Poslano: 20. travnja 2021. 16:31 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Odg: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement Hi, after analysis, we assume that proxy at reception of packets, sends ACK on

Odg: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement

ought to trigger some error handling IIRC. Anthony > On Apr 19, 2021, at 7:16 AM, Mario Ivanac wrote: > > Hi all, > > we have deployed geode cluster in kubernetes environment, and Istio/SideCars > are injected between cluster members. > While running traffic, if any Istio

Geode retry/acknowledge improvement

Hi all, we have deployed geode cluster in kubernetes environment, and Istio/SideCars are injected between cluster members. While running traffic, if any Istio/SideCar is restarted, thread will get stuck indefinitely, while waiting for reply on sent message. It seams that due to restarting of pro

Odg: [DISCUSS] CODEOWNERS mechanism feedback

Hi all, just to remind on this topic. Could we expand list of CODEOWNERS in some areas that are bottleneck. For examples I have 2 PR`s that are waiting on review from WAN area for several weeks: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/6013 https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/6048 BR, Mario _

[Discussion] RFC for Introduction of new command "alter gateway-sender"

Hi all, RFC for introduction of new command "alter gateway-sender" is submited: Introduction of new command "alter gateway-sender". Please review it and comment by Nov 16. Regards, Mario

Odg: Odg: [INFO] Latest test run of 200 DistributedTestOpenJDK8 passes

nder Murmann Poslano: 23. listopada 2020. 22:25 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Kopija: Mario Ivanac Predmet: Re: Odg: [INFO] Latest test run of 200 DistributedTestOpenJDK8 passes The failing WAN-related tests are still making up the majority of flaky tests<https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/teams

Odg: [INFO] Latest test run of 200 DistributedTestOpenJDK8 passes

continue to investigate this fault, but I can not locally reproduce this fault, so this is slowing troubleshooting. BR, Mario Šalje: Alexander Murmann Poslano: 14. srpnja 2020. 1:11 Prima: Alexander Murmann Kopija: dev@geode.apache.org ; Mario Ivanac Predmet: Re

Odg: Problem in rolling upgrade since 1.12

Hi, as I see in 1.12 release, there were bigger impacts in membership part of code with: "Move the membership code into a separate gradle sub-project" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6883 Maybe to check is this connected to reported bug. BR, Mario

Odg: About Geode rolling downgrade

Hi all, just a reminder that Alberto is still waiting for feedback, regarding his question. BR, Mario Šalje: Alberto Gomez Poslano: 14. svibnja 2020. 14:45 Prima: geode Predmet: Re: About Geode rolling downgrade Hi, I friendly reminder to the community about t

Update of SSLParameterExtension interface

Hi all, after comments that SSLParameterExtension interface has an init() method that takes a DistributionConfig as an argument (which is internal class), new solution is proposed to replace DistributionConfig with Properties. New PR is created with new proposal https://github.com/apache/geode/

PR reviews

Hi geode dev, please could someone review PRs: * https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4711 * https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4719 Thanks, Mario

Odg: Question about Hash Indexes

a true traditional hash index would be good to have in the project and maybe we would be able to un-deprecate it instead... Thanks, -Jason On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:36 AM Mario Ivanac wrote: > Hi geode dev, > > could you help us with some questions regarding Hash Indexes: > > 1.

Question about Hash Indexes

Hi geode dev, could you help us with some questions regarding Hash Indexes: 1. Why are Hash Indexes deprecated? 2. Are there any plans in the future for there removal? Thanks, Mario

Odg: acceptance test task failing?

Hi, but this commit was merged to develop, on saturday morning, and test are falling from friday. BR, Mario Šalje: Robert Houghton Poslano: 17. veljače 2020. 16:02 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Re: acceptance test task failing? The test has been errorin

Creation of buckets for partitioned region

Hi geode dev, we have observed following behavior, at creation of partitioned regions. After partitioned region is created, initialization of bucket will take place: * only at point when first data is inserted in region (bucket will be incrementally created for every added entry, till [max

Review for PR #4629

Hi all, please could someone review PR https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4629 [https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/47359?s=400&v=4] GEODE-7727: modify sender thread to detect release of connection by mivanac · Pull Request #4629 · apache/geode

Odg: ParallelGatewaySenderQueue implementation

, Mario Šalje: Mario Ivanac Poslano: 11. studenog 2019. 13:29 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: ParallelGatewaySenderQueue implementation Hi geode dev, I am investigating SerialGatewaySenderQueue and ParallelGatewaySenderQueue implementation, and I found that in

Odg: RFC - Logging to Standard Out

+1 Šalje: Jacob Barrett Poslano: 8. siječnja 2020. 21:39 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: RFC - Logging to Standard Out Please see RFC for Logging to Standard Out. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Logging+to+Standard+Out

RFC Introduction of SSL Parameter Extension

Hi, we have published new RFC "Introduction of SSL Parameter Extension" https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Introduction+of+SSL+Parameter+Extension The period of collecting feedback will finish by the end of day 13.01.2020. If you have any questions and concerns, please add to the

Review for #4488

Hi all, please could someone review PR https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4488 [https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/47359?s=400&v=4] GEODE-7582: Update initlocator list by mivanac · Pull Request #4488 · apache/geode

Wiki access

Hi All, Happy New Year! Can I have access to edit the Geode Wiki? My username is "mivanac". Thanks, Mario

Review for #4387

Hi all, please could someone review https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-7458 [GEODE-7458] Adding additional option in gfsh command "start gateway sender" to control clearing of existing queues - ASF JIRA This Jira has been LDAP enabled, i

Odg: Odg: Proposal of new config property "ssl-server-name-extension"

at the use is especially if the > consumer of that particular piece of info is going to be provided via an > external SSLEngine implementation. > > Thanks! --Jens On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 2:37 AM Mario Ivanac wrote: > Hi, > > Since this proposal is open for almost three weeks, &g

Odg: Proposal of new config property "ssl-server-name-extension"

Hi, Since this proposal is open for almost three weeks, and we have 2 plus one, We will continue with proposed solution. Regards, Mario Šalje: Mario Ivanac Poslano: 19. studenog 2019. 12:26 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Proposal of new config property

Odg: Proposal of new config property "ssl-server-name-extension"

NI and set it as default context before launching geode? This may appear as a workaround but the rationale behind `ssl-use-default-context` is to delegate the external environment to configure the SSL context in a required manner and let Geode just use it. Sai On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 3:27 AM

Odg: Proposal of new config property "ssl-server-name-extension"

technically you can take over the whole process if you set the > > > > ssl-use-default-context property and then configure the default > > > SSLContext > > > > for your entire process, but that is not ideal. > > > > > > > >

Odg: Proposal of new config property "ssl-server-name-extension"

late with something presented in the SSL certificate. > It would be great if that was explained plainly for the reader in more > detail. > > For now I can only -1. > > Charlie > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 3:27 AM Mario Ivanac > wrote: > > > Hi geode dev, > >

Odg: Odg: Proposal of new config property "ssl-server-name-extension"

Prima: Mario Ivanac Kopija: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Re: Odg: Proposal of new config property "ssl-server-name-extension" The SSL handshake is done before the Geode handshake.So additions to the Geode handshake protocol will not affect SSL connections since the secu

Odg: Proposal of new config property "ssl-server-name-extension"

;From the property "ssl-server-name-extension" it feels like we are intending to correlate with something presented in the SSL certificate. It would be great if that was explained plainly for the reader in more detail. For now I can only -1. Charlie On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 3:27 AM Mar

Proposal of new config property "ssl-server-name-extension"

Hi geode dev, as a part of solution for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-7414 we would like to introduce new config property "ssl-server-name-extension". This property will contain generic string, which will be added as Server Name Indication (SNI) parameter to Client Hello message.

Review for #4310

Hi all, please could someone review https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-7414 PR https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4310 Thanks, Mario

Odg: gateway sender queue

or should we use existing queue. By default it will be to discard/clean existing queue. Best Regards, Mario ____ Šalje: Mario Ivanac Poslano: 8. studenog 2019. 13:00 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Odg: gateway sender queue Hi all, one more clarification reg

ParallelGatewaySenderQueue implementation

Hi geode dev, I am investigating SerialGatewaySenderQueue and ParallelGatewaySenderQueue implementation, and I found that in ParallelGatewaySenderQueue.close() function, code is deleted and comment is left: // Because of bug 49060 do not close the regions of a parallel queue My question is, wh

Odg: gateway sender queue

clean existing queue, or should we use existing queue. By default it will be to discard/clean existing queue. Best Regards, Mario ____ Šalje: Mario Ivanac Poslano: 7. studenog 2019. 9:01 Prima: Dan Smith ; dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Odg: gateway sender queue Hi,

Odg: gateway sender queue

Hi, thanks for answers. Some more details regarding 1st question. Is this behavior same (for serial and parallel gateway sender) in case queue is persistent? Meaning, should queue (persistent) be purged if we restart gateway sender? Thanks, Mario Šalje: Dan S

Odg: bug fix needed for release/1.11.0

+1 for bringing this fix to release/1.11.0 Šalje: Mark Hanson Poslano: 6. studenog 2019. 18:28 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Re: bug fix needed for release/1.11.0 Any other votes? I have 2 people in favor. Voting will close at noon. Thanks, Mark > On No

gateway sender queue

Hi geode dev, we have some questions regarding gateway senders and gateway sender queue. * During testing we have observed, different behavior in parallel and serial gateway senders. In case we manually stop, than start gateway senders, for parallel gateway senders, queue is purged, but for

Special certificates for multisite

Hi, We are trying to find a solution for an situation we have. Below is the explanation of the issue, as well as a proposed way forward. We would appreciate comments from the community regarding this approach. Also, suggestions for a different approach to solve this issue would be welcome. The

Please review PR #4188

Hi, could somone review PR https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4188 for flaky test. Thanks, Mario

Odg: Need PR reviews

Hi, just to remind you. Thanks. Šalje: Mario Ivanac Poslano: 26. kolovoza 2019. 11:37 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Need PR reviews Hi Geode dev, we need review for following PRs: Jira ticket: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-7086>

Need PR reviews

Hi Geode dev, we need review for following PRs: Jira ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-7086 PR: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/510 Jira ticket: https://issues.apac

Odg: geode-native ipv6

Server and select the appropriate loopback address. In your test: Cluster cluster(…, UseIpv6(true)); I can help you in more detail if you want. -Jake > On Aug 21, 2019, at 12:34 AM, Mario Ivanac wrote: > > Hi, > > > Can you help me, how to simulate ipv6 in new integrat

Re: geode-native ipv6

framework? > On Aug 14, 2019, at 11:25 AM, Mario Ivanac wrote: > > Hi, > > > created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-7086, and PR with code > impacts. > > Proposed solution was tried on IPv6 environment, and basic operations > (PUT/GET) were successful. > &

Re: geode-native ipv6

, I could do some testing.. > > > > Thanks, > > Mark > > > >> On Aug 8, 2019, at 7:35 AM, Blake Bender wrote: > >> > >> I'm sure someone will chime in with a more definitive answer, but I'm > >> pretty certain the answer is no, sor

geode-native ipv6

Hi, can you tell me does geode-native client support ipv6? BR, Mario

Re: Reviewers for PR

Hi, could someone review PR https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/3854. Thanks Šalje: Mark Hanson Poslano: 6. kolovoza 2019. 19:21:42 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Reviewers for PR Hi All, Here is another PR that could use reviewers. GEODE-6748: Firs

Re: Server recovery severely degrades client read traffic

: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Re: Server recovery severely degrades client read traffic Interesting find! Can you share the code path you’re looking at? I see one related to putAll but not for get. Thanks! Anthony > On Aug 1, 2019, at 11:01 PM, Mario Ivanac wrote: > > Hi, &

Server recovery severely degrades client read traffic

Hi, we are observing severe throttling from the cluster when getting data from a partitioned region (no SH nor TX) while server hosting one of the redundant buckets is recovering (see ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-7039). Currently, Get operations that have not landed on a

Re: Gateway-sender alert-threshold function not working for gateway sender

Description from documentation --alert-threshold Maximum number of milliseconds that a region event can remain in the gateway sender queue before Geode logs an alert. Šalje: Mario Ivanac Poslano: 8. srpnja 2019. 10:52:20 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet

Gateway-sender alert-threshold function not working for gateway sender

Hi, according to implementation, events which exceed alert threshold are reported only for AsyncEventQueue, but not for GatewaySender (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6933). Is there any reason for this behavior?

Re: InternalCacheTransactionManager2PC removed from public API

Hi, just reformulate this question. What is the way forward if we want to use 2PC with C++ geode native? Regards, Mario Šalje: Mario Ivanac Poslano: 26. ožujka 2019. 8:42:57 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: InternalCacheTransactionManager2PC removed

Request access to JIRA

Hi Geode Dev, Can you give me access to JIRA, so I can assign to tickets. My JIRA username is "mivanac". Thanks, Mario

InternalCacheTransactionManager2PC removed from public API

Hi, Can you tell me why is this header removed from geode native public API (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3421), and how we can use XA transactions (2PC) in geode native? BR, Mario