Yes, Gester - thanks.
> On Sep 2, 2020, at 3:04 PM, Owen Nichols wrote:
>
> +1, looking forward to getting this backported as soon as possible today!
>
> On 9/2/20, 2:34 PM, "Eric Shu" wrote:
>
>+1
>
>
>From: Dick Cavender
>Sent: Wednesday, S
+1, looking forward to getting this backported as soon as possible today!
On 9/2/20, 2:34 PM, "Eric Shu" wrote:
+1
From: Dick Cavender
Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2020 11:07 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Backpor
+1
From: Dick Cavender
Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2020 11:07 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Backport GEODE-8475 to 1.13
+1
-Original Message-
From: Anilkumar Gingade
Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2020 11:05 AM
To: dev@geode.apac
+1
-Original Message-
From: Anilkumar Gingade
Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2020 11:05 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Backport GEODE-8475 to 1.13
+1 As it address a potential hang.
-Anil.
On 9/2/20, 10:38 AM, "Xiaojian Zhou" wrote:
Hi, All:
I want to
+1 As it address a potential hang.
-Anil.
On 9/2/20, 10:38 AM, "Xiaojian Zhou" wrote:
Hi, All:
I want to backport my fix in GEODE-8475 to 1.13. It fixed a hang caused by
a potential deadlock.
This fix is quite safe, I have verified it by running all queue related
regression.
+1
On 9/2/20, 10:38 AM, "Xiaojian Zhou" wrote:
Hi, All:
I want to backport my fix in GEODE-8475 to 1.13. It fixed a hang caused by
a potential deadlock.
This fix is quite safe, I have verified it by running all queue related
regression.
Regards
Gester
Hi, All:
I want to backport my fix in GEODE-8475 to 1.13. It fixed a hang caused by a
potential deadlock.
This fix is quite safe, I have verified it by running all queue related
regression.
Regards
Gester
