I just cherry-picked the change in. Thanks!
On 8/13/20, 4:55 PM, "Dick Cavender" wrote:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hanson
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2020 4:46 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-8422 to support/1.13
Hi
+1
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hanson
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2020 4:46 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-8422 to support/1.13
Hi All,
I can't remember for sure, but I think we need 3 approvals?
Thanks,
Mark
On 8/13/20, 4:22 PM, "Owen Nichols"
Hi All,
I can't remember for sure, but I think we need 3 approvals?
Thanks,
Mark
On 8/13/20, 4:22 PM, "Owen Nichols" wrote:
+1 from me. Pipeline and all other testing I've seen suggests this fix is
good
On 8/12/20, 4:52 PM, "Jianxia Chen" wrote:
+1
On Wed, Aug 1
+1 from me. Pipeline and all other testing I've seen suggests this fix is good
On 8/12/20, 4:52 PM, "Jianxia Chen" wrote:
+1
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 4:41 PM Mark Hanson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have found a case where tombstones were being cleared when the region
> wa
Thanks guys!
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:47 AM Raymond Ingles wrote:
> Yes, we're on it. Thanks!
>
> On 8/12/20, 7:25 PM, "Kirk Lund" wrote:
>
> Since this is a new test, can we please prioritize fixing it?
>
>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apach
Yes, we're on it. Thanks!
On 8/12/20, 7:25 PM, "Kirk Lund" wrote:
Since this is a new test, can we please prioritize fixing it?
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FGEODE-8379&data=02%7C01%7Cringles%40vmware.com%7C9c67a4
Will do. Looks like an easy fix
From: Kirk Lund
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 4:25 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: TimeIntegrationTest is flaky
Since this is a new test, can we please prioritize fixing it?
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?
Actually what I should say is that this does not entirely fix GEODE-8422 it
reduces the frequency to 1/3 of what it was and fixes one issue of GEODE-8422.
It is my understanding we didn't want to hold this release for the other part
of this issue. I will file that under a separate bug.
Thanks,
Yes.
On 8/13/20, 7:27 AM, "Dave Barnes" wrote:
Do I understand correctly that this fix, if validated, addresses the last
remaining release-blocker for 1.13?
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:02 PM Mark Hanson wrote:
> Not yet, we will need to wait for that to finish cleanly relative
Do I understand correctly that this fix, if validated, addresses the last
remaining release-blocker for 1.13?
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:02 PM Mark Hanson wrote:
> Not yet, we will need to wait for that to finish cleanly relative to this
> change. I guess I was just seeking to gain approval for p
10 matches
Mail list logo