Please respond with changes & additions by COB Friday, May 8.
See the "bragging points" at the bottom. Publish and Prevail, y'all!
Thanks,
Dave
## Description:
The mission of Apache Geode is the creation and maintenance of software
related
to a data management platform that provides real-time, co
Experimental features are subject to change or removal. No guarantees are
made of backwards compatibility.
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 2:53 PM Donal Evans wrote:
> Looks good to me. Fixing broken implementation and providing reliable HA
> can only be a good thing. My only concern is the backwards com
Looks good to me. Fixing broken implementation and providing reliable HA
can only be a good thing. My only concern is the backwards compatibility
issue, but I don't know if we make any guarantees regarding that for
experimental features, so it may be a non-issue.
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 8:35 AM Ray
Thanks all for the replies.
The fix has been back ported to support/1.12 [1] and support/1.13 [2]
already.
Best regards.
[1]:
https://github.com/apache/geode/commit/5a3a24e4724ba7278bc2f9482d25302ede964319
[2]:
https://github.com/apache/geode/commit/193a98a1975a2df417e50755d7badd320c7cb8af
On Th
Looks like you have the votes, Juan.
Go ahead and contribute this fix to support/1.13 and support/1.12.
Thanks,
Dave
Geode 1.13 release manager
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 10:44 AM Eric Shu wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 10:22 AM Jianxia Chen wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Thu, May 7, 2020 at
+1
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 10:22 AM Jianxia Chen wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 7:47 AM Ju@N wrote:
>
> > Hello devs,
> >
> > I'd like to propose bringing GEODE-8071 [1] to the *support/1.12* and
> > *support/1.13* branches.
> > The bug was introduced in Geode 1.8.0 and, long story shor
+1
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 7:47 AM Ju@N wrote:
> Hello devs,
>
> I'd like to propose bringing GEODE-8071 [1] to the *support/1.12* and
> *support/1.13* branches.
> The bug was introduced in Geode 1.8.0 and, long story short, prevents
> locators from gracefully shutting down whenever a rebalance o
+1
> On May 7, 2020, at 10:11 AM, Jinmei Liao wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 9:26 AM Donal Evans wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> From: Dick Cavender
>> Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 8:52 AM
>> To: dev@geode.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-8071 to s
+1
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 9:26 AM Donal Evans wrote:
> +1
>
> From: Dick Cavender
> Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 8:52 AM
> To: dev@geode.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-8071 to support/1.12 and support/1.13
>
> +1
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 7:47 AM J
+1
From: Dick Cavender
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 8:52 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-8071 to support/1.12 and support/1.13
+1
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 7:47 AM Ju@N wrote:
> Hello devs,
>
> I'd like to propose bringing GEODE-8071 [1]
+1
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 7:47 AM Ju@N wrote:
> Hello devs,
>
> I'd like to propose bringing GEODE-8071 [1] to the *support/1.12* and
> *support/1.13* branches.
> The bug was introduced in Geode 1.8.0 and, long story short, prevents
> locators from gracefully shutting down whenever a rebalance o
I have some concerns with using Properties in public APIs. The use of
Properties is not strongly typed. I can’ tell from one property to the next
what the type is. I can’t get compile time errors is the type is wrong. I don’t
know what goes into a Property based on the interface or any magic and
Hey All,
While it appears to be common practice for us to all pay attention to and burn
down pull requests on the primary apache/geode repository. It would be really
great if you all could take time to look at some of our other repositories and
help out with PRs. The apache/geode-native reposit
Done!
> On May 5, 2020, at 4:35 PM, Aaron Lindsey wrote:
>
> I think this could be moved to "In Development" since there is consensus. I
> created a JIRA for it: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8077
Just a quick nudge - we set a deadline for comments for tomorrow. Anyone
had a chance to look this over yet? Thanks!
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 2:09 PM Raymond Ingles wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The current Redis API support in Geode has been marked experimental for a
> couple years and has several bugs a
Hello devs,
I'd like to propose bringing GEODE-8071 [1] to the *support/1.12* and
*support/1.13* branches.
The bug was introduced in Geode 1.8.0 and, long story short, prevents
locators from gracefully shutting down whenever a rebalance operation is
launched from gfsh (doesn't matter whether the r
Hi again,
Considering Geode does not support online rollback for the time being and since
we have the need to rollback even a standalone system, we were thinking on a
procedure to downgrade Geode cluster tolerating downtime, but without a need to:
* spin another cluster to sync from,
*
17 matches
Mail list logo
