* As per my offline comment and as Jake had pointed out, you can cast pointers
to incomplete types, this will leverage the C type system better than mere
typedefs, and enforce a modicum of an interface’s contract.
* C does not have namespaces or overloading, so we will need a naming
convention t
More good news! Alexander Murmann and Mark Hanson have joined the
Geode PMC. Welcome!
Thanks for your contributions to the project and we're looking forward
to even more :-)
Anthony
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 5:21 PM Anthony Baker wrote:
>
> Over the last few months the Geode PMC has invited th
Build Update for apache/geode-native
-
Build: #2354
Status: Failed
Duration: 3 mins and 5 secs
Commit: 8ddc0e8 (rel/v1.12.0.RC4)
Author: Blake Bender
Message: GEODE-7694: fix pdx type lookup (#572)
- < operator should have used typeId, was using className whic
Build Update for apache/geode-examples
-
Build: #420
Status: Errored
Duration: 1 min and 13 secs
Commit: d3cc0b7 (rel/v1.12.0.RC4)
Author: Owen Nichols
Message: remove binaries
View the changeset:
https://github.com/apache/geode-examples/compare/rel/v1.12.0.R
+1
Ran my release check https://github.com/upthewaterspout/geode-release-check
-Dan
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 1:33 PM John Blum wrote:
> SDG continues to build with the Apache Geode 1.12.0 RC4 bits.
>
> https://jenkins.spring.io/job/spring-data-geode/job/master-next/16/
> https://github.com/spri
SDG continues to build with the Apache Geode 1.12.0 RC4 bits.
https://jenkins.spring.io/job/spring-data-geode/job/master-next/16/
https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-data-geode/commits/master-next
+1
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 1:23 PM Anthony Baker wrote:
> +1
>
> Things I checked:
> - exp
+1
Things I checked:
- expected files present
- hashes and signatures present and valid
- geode, geode-benchmarks, and geode-examples build from source
- no binaries present in source distributions
- verified that geode source and binary distributions have the correct SHA's
- able to create a clus
I thought the deadline for comments was extended until today (27th), so I added
a new comment on the RFC. I’m confused about the direction we are taking with
this proposal.
- Aaron
> On Mar 27, 2020, at 11:14 AM, Dan Smith wrote:
>
> With this PR, it would be possible to identify servers runn
Hello Geode Dev Community,
This is a release candidate for Apache Geode version 1.12.0.RC4.
Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this release!
Please do a review and give your feedback, including the checks you
performed.
Voting deadline:
3PM PST Mon, March 30, 2020.
P
With this PR, it would be possible to identify servers running with the
> same ip and port, because now they will be identified by member id. But
> Bruce realized that it could be a problem if two servers are running in the
> same JVM, as they will share the same member id. It seems its very unlike
Hi,
We need some advice from the dev list. We have faced a problem with the PR of
this RFC (https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4824 ), and we would like to
hear your opinion about it.
With this PR, it would be possible to identify servers running with the same ip
and port, because now they w
Another couple of thing I thought of last night.
The RFC should probably include mentions of tools like SWIG or Clang libtooling
for auto generating C-bindings for C++ headers.
One important area that isn’t covered is how this would address serialization
of types/objects in the bound language.
Hi Geode, (Happy Friday, btw)
We are cancelling the first 3 RCs to fix some small non-code issues.
Best,
EB
13 matches
Mail list logo
