Thanks for sharing Bob! I highly encourage you to submit a talk and/or plan on
attending. We always see lots of users, expert practitioners, and project
committers at this event.
Related, the CFP for ApacheCon NA is also open [1]. Submit your talk there as
well!
Thanks,
Anthony
[1] https:
+1 The changes and the risk looks minimal.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 2:16 AM Alberto Bustamante Reyes
wrote:
> +1
>
> De: Donal Evans
> Enviado: jueves, 19 de marzo de 2020 2:14
> Para: dev@geode.apache.org
> Asunto: Re: [PROPOSAL]: Include GEODE-7832, GEODE-7853
+1
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 7:27 AM Joris Melchior wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 6:33 PM Dan Smith wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > A new RFC is up for this feature
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Client+side+configuration+for+a+SNI+proxy
> > .
> >
> >
> > Pleas
Sure thing!
package org.apache.geode.examples;
import static org.apache.geode.test.dunit.VM.getVM;
import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat;
import java.io.Serializable;
import java.util.concurrent.Future;
import org.junit.Rule;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.apache.geode.te
I wonder if an approach similar to the SNI hostname PoolFactory changes would
work for this non-TLS gateway. The client needs to differentiate between the
different servers so that it doesn’t declare all of them dead should one of
them fail. If the pool knew about the gateway it could direct a
+1
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 6:33 PM Dan Smith wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A new RFC is up for this feature
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Client+side+configuration+for+a+SNI+proxy
> .
>
>
> Please review and comment by this Friday, 3/20/2020.
>
> This hopefully addresses some of t
+1
On 3/18/20, 4:13 PM, "Dan Smith" wrote:
One addendum to this proposal:
This proposed method of configuring a SNI proxy server requires that the
client sends the SNI hostname as part of the TLS handshake. In the previous
proposal we suggested it would only be sent if a SN
+1
De: Donal Evans
Enviado: jueves, 19 de marzo de 2020 2:14
Para: dev@geode.apache.org
Asunto: Re: [PROPOSAL]: Include GEODE-7832, GEODE-7853 & GEODE-7863 in Geode
1.12.0
+1
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 4:53 PM Owen Nichols wrote:
> +3
>
> > On Mar 18, 2020, at 4
