The stress test is to identify the flaky-ness within the test; and assuming
any changes to the test may have introduced the flaky-ness.
It's about paying the cost upfront or later when the test is determined to
be flaky.
If 25+ tests have been changed in a PR, the cost of running stress test for
th
What's the current timeout for StressNewTest? Maybe if we just up the
threshold to 100 tests or so and up the timeout to match we can catch
pretty much all PRs.
I'm not sure why the job is flagging more tests than it should. It looks
like at some point @rhoughon changed it to read the merge base f
>
> My interpretation is that we would cut support/1.13 from develop on the
> next scheduled cut date (May 4), and make 1.13.0 and all following 1.13.x
> patch releases directly from this branch. Otherwise it becomes a two-step
> process if all patches have to be cherry-picked from develop -> supp
> We are currently working on other issue related to this change: gw
senders pings are not reaching the gw receivers, so ClientHealthMonitor
closes the connections. I saw that the ping tasks are created by
ServerLocation, so I have tried to solve the issue by changing it to be
done by Endpoint. Thi
+1 to the proposal and the plan outlined above for the transition period.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 4:33 PM Owen Nichols wrote:
> My interpretation is that we would cut support/1.13 from develop on the
> next scheduled cut date (May 4), and make 1.13.0 and all following 1.13.x
> patch releases dir
>
> @Dan, are you thinking that secured intra-cluster communication needs to
> be deprecated as a whole?
>
> Exactly. We shouldn't be left with "partially secure" intra-cluster
communication, where some stuff goes over TLS and some is plain text.
Setting ssl-enabled-components=cluster without setti
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for your comments, but we are not planning to use TLS, so Im afraid the
PR you are working on will not solve this problem.
The origin of this issue is that we would like to be able to configure all gw
receivers with the same "hostname-for-senders" value. The reason is that we
