Re: [PROPOSAL]: Include GEODE-7717 in Release 1.12.0

2020-02-07 Thread Owen Nichols
+1 (although it looks like this already got enough votes and got merged already ;) > On Feb 7, 2020, at 9:06 AM, Jinmei Liao wrote: > > +1 > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 8:58 AM Bruce Schuchardt > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On 2/7/20, 8:36 AM, "Jinmei Liao" wrote: >> >>Hi devs, >> >>I wou

Re: [PROPOSAL]: Include GEODE-7717 in Release 1.12.0

2020-02-07 Thread Ernest Burghardt
There appears to be consensus that this is a critical fix. The following commit has been brought into release/1.12 as the critical fix for GEODE-7717: git cherry-pick -x bda6bdf50c0a6a3e7cc39fb3ff654a0c26c86d94 GEODE-7717 has been marked as 'resolved in' 1.12. Regards EB On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 a

Re: [Vote] Include GEODE-7752 into 1.12

2020-02-07 Thread Ernest Burghardt
errata On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 10:36 AM Ernest Burghardt wrote: > There appears to be consensus that this is a critical fix. > > The following commit has been brought into release/1.12 as the critical fix > for GEODE-7752: > > git cherry-pick -x 7028f601680fee3f57cbdff63951128d7180ca13 > git che

Re: please include the fix for geode-7750 and geode-7760 in 1.12

2020-02-07 Thread Ernest Burghardt
errata On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 10:36 AM Ernest Burghardt wrote: > There appears to be consensus that this is a critical fix. > > The following commit has been brought into release/1.12 as the critical fix > for GEODE-7760: > > git cherry-pick -x af8307 > > GEODE-7760 has been marked as 'resolved

Re: please include the fix for geode-7750 and geode-7760 in 1.12

2020-02-07 Thread Ernest Burghardt
There appears to be consensus that this is a critical fix. The following commit has been brought into release/1.12 as the critical fix for GEODE-7760: git cherry-pick -x af8307 GEODE- has been marked as 'resolved in' 1.12. Regards EB On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 9:07 AM Jinmei Liao wrote: > +

Re: [Vote] Include GEODE-7752 into 1.12

2020-02-07 Thread Ernest Burghardt
There appears to be consensus that this is a critical fix. The following commit has been brought into release/1.12 as the critical fix for GEODE-7752: git cherry-pick -x 7028f601680fee3f57cbdff63951128d7180ca13 git cherry-pick -x 9c102e4f8836ca32ad51a05bbd4d0107e8fc0343 GEODE- has been marke

Re: [PROPOSAL]: Include GEODE-7728 in Release 1.12.0

2020-02-07 Thread Ernest Burghardt
There appears to be consensus that this is a critical fix. The following commit has been brought into release/1.12 as the critical fix for GEODE-7728: git cherry-pick -x 6e35c201ea605075433203d4e64ca887bafd8fcb GEODE-7728 has been marked as 'resolved in' 1.12. Regards EB On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 a

Re: [PROPOSAL]: Include GEODE-7717 in Release 1.12.0

2020-02-07 Thread Jinmei Liao
+1 On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 8:58 AM Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > +1 > > On 2/7/20, 8:36 AM, "Jinmei Liao" wrote: > > Hi devs, > > I would like to include the fix for GEODE-7717[1] in release 1.12.0. > The > change modifies the json response structure of all of the "list" > operations >

Re: please include the fix for geode-7750 and geode-7760 in 1.12

2020-02-07 Thread Jinmei Liao
+1 On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 9:06 AM Owen Nichols wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 9:04 AM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On 2/7/20 8:57 AM, Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > > > af8307 fixes a number of problems with auto-reconnect that have been > > reported recently. Owen and Darrel did a

Re: please include the fix for geode-7750 and geode-7760 in 1.12

2020-02-07 Thread Owen Nichols
+1 On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 9:04 AM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > +1 > > On 2/7/20 8:57 AM, Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > > af8307 fixes a number of problems with auto-reconnect that have been > reported recently. Owen and Darrel did a lot of work in analyzing failures > and this revision addresses the prob

Re: please include the fix for geode-7750 and geode-7760 in 1.12

2020-02-07 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
+1 On 2/7/20 8:57 AM, Bruce Schuchardt wrote: af8307 fixes a number of problems with auto-reconnect that have been reported recently.  Owen and Darrel did a lot of work in analyzing failures and this revision addresses the problems they encountered, plus a couple of others exposed by stress-t

Re: [PROPOSAL]: Include GEODE-7717 in Release 1.12.0

2020-02-07 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
+1 On 2/7/20, 8:36 AM, "Jinmei Liao" wrote: Hi devs, I would like to include the fix for GEODE-7717[1] in release 1.12.0. The change modifies the json response structure of all of the "list" operations in cluster management rest service. Including it in this release, where

please include the fix for geode-7750 and geode-7760 in 1.12

2020-02-07 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
af8307 fixes a number of problems with auto-reconnect that have been reported recently.  Owen and Darrel did a lot of work in analyzing failures and this revision addresses the problems they encountered, plus a couple of others exposed by stress-testing. Problem statement: When a locator is

Re: [PROPOSAL]: Include GEODE-7717 in Release 1.12.0

2020-02-07 Thread Joris Melchior
+1 On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 11:36 AM Jinmei Liao wrote: > Hi devs, > > I would like to include the fix for GEODE-7717[1] in release 1.12.0. The > change modifies the json response structure of all of the "list" operations > in cluster management rest service. Including it in this release, where >

Re: [PROPOSAL]: Include GEODE-7717 in Release 1.12.0

2020-02-07 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
+1 On 2/7/20 8:36 AM, Jinmei Liao wrote: Hi devs, I would like to include the fix for GEODE-7717[1] in release 1.12.0. The change modifies the json response structure of all of the "list" operations in cluster management rest service. Including it in this release, where most users are just star

[PROPOSAL]: Include GEODE-7717 in Release 1.12.0

2020-02-07 Thread Jinmei Liao
Hi devs, I would like to include the fix for GEODE-7717[1] in release 1.12.0. The change modifies the json response structure of all of the "list" operations in cluster management rest service. Including it in this release, where most users are just starting to experiment with CMS rest service wou