Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to re-cut Geode 1.9.0 release branch

2019-03-19 Thread Dave Barnes
The Geode 1.9.0 release includes a source-only release of the geode-native repo. There's a pull-request in process to update version numbers and the doc build environment in that repo; should be ready to merge tomorrow morning. On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 5:20 PM Dale Emery wrote: > The Micrometer A

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to re-cut Geode 1.9.0 release branch

2019-03-19 Thread Dale Emery
The Micrometer API is in, and marked as experimental. But we have not yet updated CacheFactory to allow injecting a meter registry (or metrics publishing service) there. So currently the only way to publish is to add metrics publishing service via the ServiceLoader mechanism. — Dale Emery dem..

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to re-cut Geode 1.9.0 release branch

2019-03-19 Thread Owen Nichols
Manageability just yesterday moved all work-in-progress behind a feature flag; yes, we are comfortable releasing in the current state. > On Mar 19, 2019, at 3:29 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > > Is the geode-managability sub-project and the new micrometer API in a place > where we can cut a release

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to re-cut Geode 1.9.0 release branch

2019-03-19 Thread Dan Smith
Is the geode-managability sub-project and the new micrometer API in a place where we can cut a release branch? I know a bunch of changes have gone in since the release branch, are we comfortable releasing these new experimental features as they are right now? -Dan On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 2:38 PM

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to re-cut Geode 1.9.0 release branch

2019-03-19 Thread Alexander Murmann
+1. We want to ship with confidence and we have more trust in develop right now. On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 2:11 PM Dick Cavender wrote: > +1 to re-cutting the 1.9 release branch off a more stable develop sha > within the last couple days. > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:14 PM Bruce Schuchardt > wro

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to re-cut Geode 1.9.0 release branch

2019-03-19 Thread Anilkumar Gingade
+1 to re-cut. -Anil. On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 2:11 PM Dick Cavender wrote: > +1 to re-cutting the 1.9 release branch off a more stable develop sha > within the last couple days. > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:14 PM Bruce Schuchardt > wrote: > > > If we recut the release branch we need to update

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to re-cut Geode 1.9.0 release branch

2019-03-19 Thread Dick Cavender
+1 to re-cutting the 1.9 release branch off a more stable develop sha within the last couple days. On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:14 PM Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > If we recut the release branch we need to update JIRA tickets marked > fixed in 1.10 > > On 3/19/19 12:48 PM, Sai Boorlagadda wrote: > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to re-cut Geode 1.9.0 release branch

2019-03-19 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
If we recut the release branch we need to update JIRA tickets marked fixed in 1.10 On 3/19/19 12:48 PM, Sai Boorlagadda wrote: > It was known at the time that develop was not as stable as desired, so we planned to cherry-pick fixes from develop until the release branch was stable enough to shi

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to re-cut Geode 1.9.0 release branch

2019-03-19 Thread Sai Boorlagadda
> It was known at the time that develop was not as stable as desired, so we planned to cherry-pick fixes from develop until the release branch was stable enough to ship. I want to clarify that we decided to cut the release branch not that develop was not stable. But really that it is desirable to c