Re: August 2018 Board Report Volunteer

2018-08-09 Thread Anthony Baker
@Mark, looks like we got enough eyeballs on this. Can you submit? Thanks, Anthony > On Aug 9, 2018, at 4:03 PM, Dave Barnes wrote: > > +1 LGTM > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Kirk Lund wrote: > >> +1 looks good! >> >> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: >> >>> This

Re: Testing code in geode-junit and geode-dunit src/main

2018-08-09 Thread Jacob Barrett
I see those tests in the main. I’m correcting those in an upcoming pr. Looks like they are tests for shared test classes so they will go in geode-dunit/src/test. I’ll update this email after I burn through them. > On Aug 9, 2018, at 3:56 PM, Kirk Lund wrote: > > We now have geode-junit and ge

Re: August 2018 Board Report Volunteer

2018-08-09 Thread Dave Barnes
+1 LGTM On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Kirk Lund wrote: > +1 looks good! > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > > This is a bit late so please review asap. Thanks! > > > > ## Description: > > Apache Geode provides a database-like consistency model, reliable > > transacti

Re: August 2018 Board Report Volunteer

2018-08-09 Thread Kirk Lund
+1 looks good! On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: > This is a bit late so please review asap. Thanks! > > ## Description: > Apache Geode provides a database-like consistency model, reliable > transaction processing and a shared-nothing architecture to maintain > very low laten

Testing code in geode-junit and geode-dunit src/main

2018-08-09 Thread Kirk Lund
We now have geode-junit and geode-dunit modules which contain the testing frameworks and rules that we've been using in Geode tests. These are also being published to maven and have release jars. Yay! There is some code however that was moved from src/test of various modules into the src/main of b

Re: August 2018 Board Report Volunteer

2018-08-09 Thread Dan Smith
+1, Looks good to me! -Dan On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Joey McAllister wrote: > Looks great, Anthony! Thanks for putting this together! > > My only note is to capitalize "YouTube" in the reference to Addison's video > series. > > Best, > Joey > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 3:46 PM Anthony Baker

Re: August 2018 Board Report Volunteer

2018-08-09 Thread Joey McAllister
Looks great, Anthony! Thanks for putting this together! My only note is to capitalize "YouTube" in the reference to Addison's video series. Best, Joey On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 3:46 PM Anthony Baker wrote: > This is a bit late so please review asap. Thanks! > > ## Description: > Apache Geode pro

[Spring CI] Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #1004 was SUCCESSFUL (with 2423 tests)

2018-08-09 Thread Spring CI
--- Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #1004 was successful. --- Scheduled 2425 tests in total. https://build.spring.io/browse/SGF-NAG-1004/ -- Thi

Re: August 2018 Board Report Volunteer

2018-08-09 Thread Anthony Baker
This is a bit late so please review asap. Thanks! ## Description: Apache Geode provides a database-like consistency model, reliable transaction processing and a shared-nothing architecture to maintain very low latency performance with high concurrency processing. ## Issues: There are no issues r

Re: Proposal to support custom java.security.Provider

2018-08-09 Thread Jinmei Liao
let me see if my understanding is correct: if ssl-enabled-component is none, then we would accept non-ssl connections, no ssl context will be used. if ssl-enabled-component is something other than "none", but we don't specify any other ssl-* configurations, then we use the default ssl context provi

Re: Reverting bad commit

2018-08-09 Thread Kirk Lund
This should be fixed now. On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: > Looks like I introduced a bad commit. I'm working on reverting it. Sorry > for the inconvenience! >

Reverting bad commit

2018-08-09 Thread Kirk Lund
Looks like I introduced a bad commit. I'm working on reverting it. Sorry for the inconvenience!

Re: Proposal to support custom java.security.Provider

2018-08-09 Thread Anthony Baker
> On Aug 9, 2018, at 10:05 AM, Jacob Barrett wrote: > > > > On Aug 9, 2018, at 9:42 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > >>> >>> >>> I would like to also get consensus on defaulting GEODE's behavior to always >>> use default SSL context instead of introducing a new parameter >>> 'ssl-use-default-s

Re: Proposal to support custom java.security.Provider

2018-08-09 Thread Jacob Barrett
On Aug 9, 2018, at 9:42 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: >> >> >> I would like to also get consensus on defaulting GEODE's behavior to always >> use default SSL context instead of introducing a new parameter >> 'ssl-use-default-sslcontext'. If user's have specified any existing ssl-* >> props then t

Re: [Proposal] Windows CI integration to 'develop' pipeline.

2018-08-09 Thread Sai Boorlagadda
Windows jobs are live and run in parallel to existing jobs. On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 11:49 AM Dan Smith wrote: > +1 for in parallel. > > -Dan > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Jacob Barrett > wrote: > > > Parallel > > > > > On Aug 8, 2018, at 11:32 AM, Sai Boorlagadda < > sai_boorlaga...@apach

Re: Proposal to support custom java.security.Provider

2018-08-09 Thread Anthony Baker
> > > I would like to also get consensus on defaulting GEODE's behavior to always > use default SSL context instead of introducing a new parameter > 'ssl-use-default-sslcontext'. If user's have specified any existing ssl-* > props then the current implementation is exercised (ie to configure the