[Spring CI] Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #926 was SUCCESSFUL (with 2406 tests)

--- Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #926 was successful. --- Scheduled 2408 tests in total. https://build.spring.io/browse/SGF-NAG-926/ -- This

Re: Apache Geode Logo

Hi Mike, The attachment doesn't seem to have attached to your email. Thanks, Galen On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Michael Stolz wrote: > Can someone who has sufficient mojo please update the Apache Geode logo on > geode.apache.org with the attached version with the TM added? > > > > -- > Mik

Apache Geode Logo

Can someone who has sufficient mojo please update the Apache Geode logo on geode.apache.org with the attached version with the TM added? -- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Lead Mobile: +1-631-835-4771 Download the GemFire book here.

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Geode 1.7.0 release branch created

+1 On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 9:29 AM Michael Stolz wrote: > +1 > > -- > Mike Stolz > Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Lead > Mobile: +1-631-835-4771 > Download the GemFire book here. > < > https://content.pivotal.io/ebooks/scaling-data-services-with-pivotal-gemfire > > > > On Wed, May 23, 2018

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Geode 1.7.0 release branch created

+1 -- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Lead Mobile: +1-631-835-4771 Download the GemFire book here. On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Barbara Pruijn wrote: > +1 > > > On May 23, 2018, at 8:33 AM, Joey M

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Geode 1.7.0 release branch created

+1 > On May 23, 2018, at 8:33 AM, Joey McAllister wrote: > > +1 for including these. They are documentation-only changes that are > applicable to 1.7. > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 8:24 AM Karen Miller wrote: > >> Geode devs, I think that my merges of commits for GEODE-5071 and >> GEODE-5242 r

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Geode 1.7.0 release branch created

+1 for including these. They are documentation-only changes that are applicable to 1.7. On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 8:24 AM Karen Miller wrote: > Geode devs, I think that my merges of commits for GEODE-5071 and > GEODE-5242 really > belong in Geode 1.7. They just missed making it in before the rel

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Geode 1.7.0 release branch created

Geode devs, I think that my merges of commits for GEODE-5071 and GEODE-5242 really belong in Geode 1.7. They just missed making it in before the release branch was cut. I'm going to cherry pick them into the 1.7 release branch. If anyone disagrees with this, let's discuss why, and we can always

Re: Reviews and Conflicts in Pull Requests

Hello Bruce, Sounds good to me, thanks for the quick reply!. Best regards. On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 4:44 PM Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > I don't think the "single commit" notion is even a good one for an > original PR. I've discussed this with other people and we think it's > okay for the PR to h