Geode unit tests completed in 'develop/DistributedTest' with non-zero exit code

Pipeline results can be found at: Concourse: https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/teams/main/pipelines/develop/jobs/DistributedTest/builds/190

Re: Trying to cleanup dunit use of client cache

I haven't encountered a customer using a persistent region on a client in many years. Maybe that entire construct should be deprecated on a ClientCache. -- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager Mobile: 631-835-4771 On Mar 9, 2018 3:39 PM, "Kirk Lund" wrote: > And I can't invok

Re: Requesting permission to add a proposal to the Geode Wiki

Hi Patrick, Permission granted. Happy Editing! --Mark On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Patrick Rhomberg wrote: > Hello all! > > I wanted to propose adding a public cluster configuration API, and I think > that conversation would greatly benefit from the formatting that email too > critically l

Re: Trying to cleanup dunit use of client cache

And I can't invoke createRegionFactory(RegionShortcut.REPLICATE_PERSISTENT) because ClientCache throws UnsupportedOperationException for it... /** * @since GemFire 6.5 */ @Override public RegionFactory createRegionFactory(RegionShortcut shortcut) { if (isClient()) { throw ne

Trying to cleanup dunit use of client cache

I keep running into things that the dunit tests are doing in a client cache that cannot be done with non-deprecated APIs. Is there a non-deprecated way to create a PERSISTENT_REPLICATE region in a client cache? AttributesFactory factory = new AttributesFactory(); factory.setDataPolicy

Requesting permission to add a proposal to the Geode Wiki

Hello all! I wanted to propose adding a public cluster configuration API, and I think that conversation would greatly benefit from the formatting that email too critically lacks. My username is prhomberg Imagination is Change. ~Patrick

[Spring CI] Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #851 was SUCCESSFUL (with 2379 tests). Change made by John Blum.

--- Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #851 was successful. --- Scheduled with changes by John Blum. 2381 tests in total. https://build.spring.io/browse

Geode unit tests completed in 'develop/IntegrationTest' with non-zero exit code

Pipeline results can be found at: Concourse: https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/teams/main/pipelines/develop/jobs/IntegrationTest/builds/266

Errored: jinmeiliao/geode#259 (cliUtil2 - 2c21167)

Build Update for jinmeiliao/geode - Build: #259 Status: Errored Duration: 5 minutes and 37 seconds Commit: 2c21167 (cliUtil2) Author: Jinmei Liao Message: MockExtensionCommands should not use non public GfshCommand View the changeset: https://github.com/jinme

Re: [PROPOSAL]: concurrent bucket moves during rebalance

Swapnil, Interesting points, here are my thoughts: > Given that there is already support for parallel rebalancing among regions, > I do not see the value in supporting parallel rebalancing of buckets. I think there are some advantages to parallel rebalance of a region over rebalancing regions in

Broken: apache/geode#6683 (develop - e09c409)

Build Update for apache/geode - Build: #6683 Status: Broken Duration: 20 minutes and 49 seconds Commit: e09c409 (develop) Author: Udo Message: GEODE-4791: backing out upgrade to 4.5.1 due to an incompatibility with dockerized-test library, which only supports

Re: [PROPOSAL]: concurrent bucket moves during rebalance

It would be interesting to have a way to model the behavior of the current algorithm and compare it to the proposal under various conditions like membership changes, data imbalance, etc. That would let us understand the optimality of the change in a concrete way. Anthony > On Mar 9, 2018, at

Re: [PROPOSAL]: concurrent bucket moves during rebalance

Given that there is already support for parallel rebalancing among regions, I do not see the value in supporting parallel rebalancing of buckets. If we end up doing this anyway, I would suggest to not rely on "parameters" for throttling, as these parameters would have to be configured in advance w