Geode unit tests completed in 'develop/IntegrationTest' with non-zero exit code

2018-02-06 Thread apachegeodeci
Pipeline results can be found at: Concourse: https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/teams/main/pipelines/develop/jobs/IntegrationTest/builds/180

Geode unit tests completed in 'develop/IntegrationTest' with non-zero exit code

2018-02-06 Thread apachegeodeci
Pipeline results can be found at: Concourse: https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/teams/main/pipelines/develop/jobs/IntegrationTest/builds/179

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add mod and arithmetic functionality to OQL

2018-02-06 Thread Nabarun Nag
+1 [Apache ID] On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 3:40 PM Nabarun Nag wrote: > +1 > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 12:12 PM Kirk Lund wrote: > >> +1 for adding these ops to OQL >> >> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Anilkumar Gingade >> wrote: >> >> > +1 like the idea... >> > >> > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:22 AM,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add mod and arithmetic functionality to OQL

2018-02-06 Thread Nabarun Nag
+1 On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 12:12 PM Kirk Lund wrote: > +1 for adding these ops to OQL > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Anilkumar Gingade > wrote: > > > +1 like the idea... > > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Jason Huynh wrote: > > > > > This is a proposal to add the ability to execute a

[Spring CI] Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #820 was SUCCESSFUL (with 2324 tests). Change made by Christoph Strobl.

2018-02-06 Thread Spring CI
--- Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #820 was successful. --- Scheduled with changes by Christoph Strobl. 2326 tests in total. https://build.spring.io

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add mod and arithmetic functionality to OQL

2018-02-06 Thread Jason Huynh
Based on the oql.g file I think it would but I can add some tests to be sure On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 2:04 PM Anthony Baker wrote: > Will the OQL engine obey operator precedence rules? > > Anthony > > > > On Feb 6, 2018, at 10:22 AM, Jason Huynh wrote: > > > > This is a proposal to add the abilit

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add mod and arithmetic functionality to OQL

2018-02-06 Thread Anthony Baker
Will the OQL engine obey operator precedence rules? Anthony > On Feb 6, 2018, at 10:22 AM, Jason Huynh wrote: > > This is a proposal to add the ability to execute arithmetic operations on > numeric fields in an OQL query. The corresponding jira ticket is: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow

Geode unit tests completed in 'develop/DistributedTest' with non-zero exit code

2018-02-06 Thread apachegeodeci
Pipeline results can be found at: Concourse: https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/teams/main/pipelines/develop/jobs/DistributedTest/builds/124

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add mod and arithmetic functionality to OQL

2018-02-06 Thread Kirk Lund
+1 for adding these ops to OQL On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Anilkumar Gingade wrote: > +1 like the idea... > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Jason Huynh wrote: > > > This is a proposal to add the ability to execute arithmetic operations on > > numeric fields in an OQL query. The corresp

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add mod and arithmetic functionality to OQL

2018-02-06 Thread Anilkumar Gingade
+1 like the idea... On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Jason Huynh wrote: > This is a proposal to add the ability to execute arithmetic operations on > numeric fields in an OQL query. The corresponding jira ticket is: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-4327 > > The operation symbols th

[PROPOSAL] Add mod and arithmetic functionality to OQL

2018-02-06 Thread Jason Huynh
This is a proposal to add the ability to execute arithmetic operations on numeric fields in an OQL query. The corresponding jira ticket is: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-4327 The operation symbols that will be added are mod, %, +, -, /, *. These will correspond to modulo, modulo, a

Re: Naming unit tests and integration tests

2018-02-06 Thread Kirk Lund
+1 for renaming existing tests to follow the new conventions and especially renaming old TRAC bug number tests I'll update the wiki today and then report back to this thread. On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > Should we make a pass over all of the tests and rename them to

Build for version 1.5.0-build.410 of Apache Geode failed.

2018-02-06 Thread apachegeodeci
= The build job for Apache Geode version 1.5.0-build.410 has failed. Build artifacts are available at: http://files.apachegeode-ci.info/builds/1.5.0-build.410/geode-build-artifacts-1.5.0-build.410.tgz

Re: C# native client problem

2018-02-06 Thread Jacob Barrett
Right, that is why I’m curious what SHA because the sources on develop for the last few months allow multiple caches in a process or app domain. > On Feb 6, 2018, at 6:38 AM, Michael Stolz wrote: > > Also could be that he's hitting the Cache singleton. Hard to tell from what > he wrote, but I

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Geode 1.4.0

2018-02-06 Thread Michael Stolz
Super! Congratulations -- Mike Stolz On Feb 5, 2018 8:36 PM, "Akihiro Kitada" wrote: > Awesome! > > > -- > Akihiro Kitada | Staff Customer Engineer | +81 80 3716 3736 > <+81%2080-3716-3736> > Support.Pivotal.io | Mon-Fri 9:00am to > 5:30pm JST | 1-877-477-2

Re: C# native client problem

2018-02-06 Thread Michael Stolz
Also could be that he's hitting the Cache singleton. Hard to tell from what he wrote, but I think he's attempting to new multiple Caches in the same process. -- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager Mobile: 631-835-4771 On Feb 6, 2018 9:35 AM, "Jacob Barrett" wrote: > Since th

Re: C# native client problem

2018-02-06 Thread Jacob Barrett
Since there is no official release of the Geode Native C# client can you please tell us what SHA you have compiled? Quickly I can say you can’t create two regions with the same name in the same cache. -Jake > On Feb 6, 2018, at 1:30 AM, Rupert St John Webster > wrote: > > Dear All, > > P

C# native client problem

2018-02-06 Thread Rupert St John Webster
Dear All, Per https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48628342/ I have a C# class Geode.cs that sets up a native client local cache, pool and region and does some work. I want to reuse the class and have 2 or more local caches that do work (ultimately to have different callbacks