Github user davinash closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/298
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/294
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user davinash commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/298
This closes #298
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user jinmeiliao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/294#discussion_r89939851
--- Diff:
geode-pulse/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/tools/pulse/tests/rules/ScreenshotOnFailureRule.java
---
@@ -45,7 +45,9 @@ private void take
We could allow the User to specify either a --type or a combination of
--data-policy and --scope but not all three.
Apparently the introduction of RegionShortcut (and its use for --type) was
supposed to simplify things. AttributesFactory was deprecated in favor of
using shortcuts. The shortcuts co
I think we need to add --data-policy and --scope to GFSH.
--Udo
On 11/28/16 15:39, Kirk Lund wrote:
Yep, the --type argument in gfsh matches the enum values of
org.apache.geode.cache.RegionShortcut which doesn't include any shortcuts
for global.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer
Yep, the --type argument in gfsh matches the enum values of
org.apache.geode.cache.RegionShortcut which doesn't include any shortcuts
for global.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer
wrote:
> I think it was never added. I think we keep on favoring shortcuts above
> correct configurati
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/53685/
---
(Updated Nov. 28, 2016, 11:27 p.m.)
Review request for geode, Kevin Duling, Kir
I think it was never added. I think we keep on favoring shortcuts above
correct configuration properties.
--Udo
On 11/28/16 15:15, Kirk Lund wrote:
Looks like global regions cannot be created using GFSH. We should either
add support for global scope to GFSH or remove global scope (and the
Reg
Looks like global regions cannot be created using GFSH. We should either
add support for global scope to GFSH or remove global scope (and the
RegionLock APIs).
Does anyone know if global scope is officially deprecated? Or why it's not
supported by GFSH?
-Kirk
I think this is a problem with Java... I recall that this is a known
issue in Java and nothing to worry about.
On 11/28/16 14:02, Kirk Lund wrote:
I've started seeing the following intermixed with GFSH output when starting
servers on a Mac:
objc[16455]: Class JavaLaunchHelper is implemented i
I've started seeing the following intermixed with GFSH output when starting
servers on a Mac:
objc[16455]: Class JavaLaunchHelper is implemented in both
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_66.jdk/Contents/Home/jre/bin/java
and
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_66.jdk/Contents/Home/
Github user pdxrunner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/282
This looks good. I'll pull it in as my first commit
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user kirklund commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/293
Some additional information on using Awaitility:
Use a larger timeout value such as 60 seconds. If you use 1 second, then
sometime the test is going to have a false failure when it
Github user kirklund commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/283
I tried to pull this in but I get an error message about the branch not
existing:
fatal: Couldn't find remote ref feature/GEODE-2098
Looks like the pull request is still op
Github user kjduling commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/290
Confict fixed. Precheckin running.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user metatype commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/297
Thanks for the contribution! However, I don't think we should require user
input in order to gather stack traces. Quite often a user will automate
collection (`gfsh export stack-traces ..
Github user kjduling commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/290
Merged in latest develop branch. Precheckin running.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
18 matches
Mail list logo
