On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 08:15:00AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 13:11:02 +0100
> Morten Brørup wrote:
>
> > Unlike memcpy() and other copy functions, rte_ether_addr_copy() takes the
> > destination as the second parameter.
> >
> > Not following well established conventio
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 13:11:02 +0100
Morten Brørup wrote:
> Unlike memcpy() and other copy functions, rte_ether_addr_copy() takes the
> destination as the second parameter.
>
> Not following well established conventions adds a high risk of causing bugs
> in the applications/libraries/drivers; it
Unlike memcpy() and other copy functions, rte_ether_addr_copy() takes the
destination as the second parameter.
Not following well established conventions adds a high risk of causing bugs in
the applications/libraries/drivers; it is likely that developers expect copy()
functions to take paramete
3 matches
Mail list logo