On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 11:03:11AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 27/03/2025 17:17, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 11:00:40AM +0200, Etelson, Gregory wrote:
> > > Hello Morten,
> > >
> > > Thank you for raising these questions !
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Do we want the DPDK project i
27/03/2025 17:17, Bruce Richardson:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 11:00:40AM +0200, Etelson, Gregory wrote:
> > Hello Morten,
> >
> > Thank you for raising these questions !
> >
> > >
> > > Do we want the DPDK project itself to support rust?
> > > Or should parts of this be a DPDK hosted project, li
Hello,
I pulled the raw library bindings out of DPDK source into a dedicated crate and
cleaned up compilation warnings.
Also I started a testpmd like application - runpmd.
At this stage it can receive buffers and insert flows with very limited items
and actions coverage.
The total patches a
On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 at 10:20, Bruce Richardson
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 12:25:16PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 21:09:21 +0300 (IDT)
> > "Etelson, Gregory" wrote:
> >
> > > >> Hello Morten,
> > > >>
> > > >> Thank you for raising these questions !
> > > >>
> >
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 12:25:16PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 21:09:21 +0300 (IDT)
> "Etelson, Gregory" wrote:
>
> > >> Hello Morten,
> > >>
> > >> Thank you for raising these questions !
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> Do we want the DPDK project itself to support rust?
> > >
Hello Morten,
Thank you for raising these questions !
Do we want the DPDK project itself to support rust?
Or should parts of this be a DPDK hosted project, like grout?
Rust packages management is different.
Also DPDK Rust code will eventually provide a different API.
At this stage, DPDK host
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 11:00:40AM +0200, Etelson, Gregory wrote:
> Hello Morten,
>
> Thank you for raising these questions !
>
> >
> > Do we want the DPDK project itself to support rust?
> > Or should parts of this be a DPDK hosted project, like grout?
>
> Rust packages management is different
hosted project looks like a good idea.
I don't object to supporting rust, quite the opposite. I'm only trying to think
ahead...
I would hate to see a DPDK patch being rejected because it doesn't support
rust, or needs additional work to not break DPDK for rust.
And how about the
...
I would hate to see a DPDK patch being rejected because it doesn't support
rust, or needs additional work to not break DPDK for rust.
And how about the CI - do we want it to test "DPDK for rust", and how many
resources are we going to put into this?
-Morten
9 matches
Mail list logo
