On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 12:46 PM Maryam Tahhan wrote:
> > If there are fixes mixed in, please separate them in dedicated patches
> > so we can backport them to LTS releases.
>
> Thanks for the Feedback David, I don't quite understand the ask here, is to
> to have a separate patch for documentatio
On 21/12/2023 11:36, David Marchand wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 4:40 PM Maryam Tahhan wrote:
With the original 'use_cni' implementation, (using a
hardcoded socket rather than a configurable one),
if a DPDK pod is requesting multiple net devices
and these devices are from different po
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 4:40 PM Maryam Tahhan wrote:
>
> With the original 'use_cni' implementation, (using a
> hardcoded socket rather than a configurable one),
> if a DPDK pod is requesting multiple net devices
> and these devices are from different pools, then
> the container attempts t
com;
> liuyongl...@huawei.com; Koikkara Reeny, Shibin
> ; Loftus, Ciara
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Tahhan, Maryam
> Subject: [v6] net/af_xdp: enable uds_path instead of use_cni
>
> With the original 'use_cni' implementation, (using a hardcoded socket rather
> than a configurable
With the original 'use_cni' implementation, (using a
hardcoded socket rather than a configurable one),
if a DPDK pod is requesting multiple net devices
and these devices are from different pools, then
the container attempts to mount all the netdev UDSes
in the pod as /tmp/afxdp.sock. Which means th
5 matches
Mail list logo
