Re: [dpdk-web] [RFC PATCH] process: new library approval in principle

2023-04-24 Thread Thomas Monjalon
17/04/2023 15:33, Jerin Jacob: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 7:17 PM Jerin Jacob wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 11:55 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > @Thomas Monjalon Could you check the below comments and share your > opinion to make forward progress. > > > > 13/02/2023 10:26, jer...@marvell.com: >

Re: [dpdk-web] [RFC PATCH] process: new library approval in principle

2023-04-20 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 9:10 PM Kevin Traynor wrote: > > On 13/02/2023 09:26, jer...@marvell.com wrote: > > From: Jerin Jacob > > > > Based on TB meeting[1] action item, defining > > the process for new library approval in principle. > > > > [1] > > https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2023-Januar

Re: [dpdk-web] [RFC PATCH] process: new library approval in principle

2023-04-19 Thread Kevin Traynor
On 13/02/2023 09:26, jer...@marvell.com wrote: From: Jerin Jacob Based on TB meeting[1] action item, defining the process for new library approval in principle. [1] https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2023-January/260035.html Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob --- content/process/_index.md | 33 ++

Re: [dpdk-web] [RFC PATCH] process: new library approval in principle

2023-04-17 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 6:18 PM Jerin Jacob wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 7:17 PM Jerin Jacob wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 11:55 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > > > Thanks for formalizing our process. > > > > Thanks for the review. > > Ping @Thomas Monjalon Could you check the

Re: [dpdk-web] [RFC PATCH] process: new library approval in principle

2023-04-10 Thread Konstantin Ananyev
rom: Jerin Jacob Based on TB meeting[1] action item, defining the process for new library approval in principle. [1] https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2023-January/260035.html Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob --- content/process/_index.md | 33 + 1 file changed, 3

Re: [dpdk-web] [RFC PATCH] process: new library approval in principle

2023-03-30 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 7:17 PM Jerin Jacob wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 11:55 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > Thanks for formalizing our process. > > Thanks for the review. Ping > > > > > 13/02/2023 10:26, jer...@marvell.com: > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/content/process/_index.md > >

Re: [dpdk-web] [RFC PATCH] process: new library approval in principle

2023-03-15 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 11:55 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Thanks for formalizing our process. Thanks for the review. > > 13/02/2023 10:26, jer...@marvell.com: > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/content/process/_index.md > > First question: is the website the best place for this process? > > Inside the

Re: [dpdk-web] [RFC PATCH] process: new library approval in principle

2023-03-03 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Thanks for formalizing our process. 13/02/2023 10:26, jer...@marvell.com: > --- /dev/null > +++ b/content/process/_index.md First question: is the website the best place for this process? Inside the code guides, we have a contributing section, but I'm not sure it is a good fit for the decision p

Re: [dpdk-web] [RFC PATCH] process: new library approval in principle

2023-03-01 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 2:56 PM wrote: > > From: Jerin Jacob > > Based on TB meeting[1] action item, defining > the process for new library approval in principle. > > [1] > https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2023-January/260035.html Ping for review. > > Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob > --- > c

[dpdk-web] [RFC PATCH] process: new library approval in principle

2023-02-13 Thread jerinj
From: Jerin Jacob Based on TB meeting[1] action item, defining the process for new library approval in principle. [1] https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2023-January/260035.html Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob --- content/process/_index.md | 33 + 1 file changed, 3