Re: [dpdk-dev] secondary processes and private data

2018-09-26 Thread Alejandro Lucero
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 3:33 PM Stephen Hemminger < step...@networkplumber.org> wrote: > On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 15:21:52 +0200 > Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > Hi Alejandro, > > > > 25/09/2018 16:10, Alejandro Lucero: > > > I've a problem when part of device private data needs to be private per > > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] secondary processes and private data

2018-09-26 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 15:21:52 +0200 Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi Alejandro, > > 25/09/2018 16:10, Alejandro Lucero: > > I've a problem when part of device private data needs to be private per > > process. > > It appears we are facing the same issue to support multi-process in tap. > > > Curren

Re: [dpdk-dev] secondary processes and private data

2018-09-26 Thread Alejandro Lucero
Yes, I agree. On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 2:21 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi Alejandro, > > 25/09/2018 16:10, Alejandro Lucero: > > I've a problem when part of device private data needs to be private per > > process. > > It appears we are facing the same issue to support multi-process in tap. > > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] secondary processes and private data

2018-09-26 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Hi Alejandro, 25/09/2018 16:10, Alejandro Lucero: > I've a problem when part of device private data needs to be private per > process. It appears we are facing the same issue to support multi-process in tap. > Current multiprocess support shares device private data between primary and > secondar

Re: [dpdk-dev] secondary processes and private data

2018-09-26 Thread Alejandro Lucero
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 3:20 PM Burakov, Anatoly wrote: > On 25-Sep-18 3:10 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > > I've a problem when part of device private data needs to be private per > > process. > > > > Current multiprocess support shares device private data between primary > > and secondaries but

Re: [dpdk-dev] secondary processes and private data

2018-09-25 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
On 25-Sep-18 3:10 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: I've a problem when part of device private data needs to be private per process. Current multiprocess support shares device private data between primary and secondaries but it is all dependent on a pointer initialized to the same memory address by

[dpdk-dev] secondary processes and private data

2018-09-25 Thread Alejandro Lucero
I've a problem when part of device private data needs to be private per process. Current multiprocess support shares device private data between primary and secondaries but it is all dependent on a pointer initialized to the same memory address by the multiprocess support code. If there is a per-p