o:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Masaru OKI
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 2:41 PM
To: Saurabh Mishra; users at dpdk.org; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_mbuf size for jumbo frame
Hi,
1. Take care of unit size of mempool for mbuf.
2. Call rte_eth_dev_set_mtu() for each interface.
> <mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org>] On Behalf Of Masaru OKI
> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 2:41 PM
> To: Saurabh Mishra; users at dpdk.org <mailto:users at dpdk.org>;
> dev at dpdk.org <mailto:dev at dpdk.org>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-d
;
> Mike
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Masaru OKI
> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 2:41 PM
> To: Saurabh Mishra; users at dpdk.org; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_mbuf size for jumbo frame
>
> Hi,
>
&g
inked lists.
>>>
>>> Don't make the mbufs huge.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Masaru OKI
>>> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 2:41 PM
>>>
Hi,
1. Take care of unit size of mempool for mbuf.
2. Call rte_eth_dev_set_mtu() for each interface.
Note that some PMDs does not supported change MTU.
On 2016/01/26 6:02, Saurabh Mishra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We wanted to use 10400 bytes size of each rte_mbuf to enable Jumbo frames.
> Do you guys
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Masaru OKI
>> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 2:41 PM
>> To: Saurabh Mishra; users at dpdk.org; dev at dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rte
Hi,
We wanted to use 10400 bytes size of each rte_mbuf to enable Jumbo frames.
Do you guys see any problem with that? Would all the drivers like ixgbe,
i40e, vmxnet3, virtio and bnx2x work with larger rte_mbuf size?
We would want to avoid detailing with chained mbufs.
/Saurabh
7 matches
Mail list logo
