> On Jul 24, 2018, at 6:31 AM, Van Haaren, Harry
> wrote:
>
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Morten Brørup
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 9:14 AM
>> To: Olivier Matz ; Wiles, Keith
>>
>> Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli ; dev@dpdk.
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Morten Brørup
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 9:14 AM
> To: Olivier Matz ; Wiles, Keith
>
> Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli ; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_mbuf library likely()/unlikely()
>
> > -Original
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Matz
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 9:29 AM
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:40:03PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Jul 23, 2018, at 2:09 PM, Morten Brørup
> wrote:
> > >
> > > I haven'
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:40:03PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>
>
> > On Jul 23, 2018, at 2:09 PM, Morten Brørup
> > wrote:
> >
> > I haven't performance tested, but they are compiler branch prediction hints
> > pointing out the most likely execution path, so I expect them to have a
> >
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Honnappa Nagarahalli
>> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2018 7:52 PM
>> To: Morten Brørup; Olivier Matz
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_mbuf library likely()/unlikely()
>>
>> Do you se
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 20:59:29 +0200
Morten Brørup wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
> > Sent: Monday, July 23, 2018 7:38 PM
> > To: Morten Brørup
> > Cc: Olivier Matz; dev@dpdk.org
> > Subj
To: Morten Brørup; Olivier Matz
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_mbuf library likely()/unlikely()
>
> Do you see any performance improvements with these changes?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dev On Behalf Of Morten Brørup
> Sent: Monday, July
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2018 7:38 PM
> To: Morten Brørup
> Cc: Olivier Matz; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_mbuf library likely()/unlikely()
>
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018
Do you see any performance improvements with these changes?
-Original Message-
From: dev On Behalf Of Morten Brørup
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2018 8:54 AM
To: Olivier Matz
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] rte_mbuf library likely()/unlikely()
Hi Olivier,
I noticed that
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 15:53:42 +0200
Morten Brørup wrote:
> Hi Olivier,
>
>
>
> I noticed that __rte_pktmbuf_read() could do with an unlikely(), so I went
> through the entire library. Here are my suggested modifications.
>
>
>
>
>
> diff -bu rte_mbuf.c.orig rte_mbuf.c
>
> --- rte_mbuf
Hi Olivier,
I noticed that __rte_pktmbuf_read() could do with an unlikely(), so I went
through the entire library. Here are my suggested modifications.
diff -bu rte_mbuf.c.orig rte_mbuf.c
--- rte_mbuf.c.orig 2018-07-23 15:13:22.0 +0200
+++ rte_mbuf.c 2018-07-23 15:32:53.0
11 matches
Mail list logo