Re: [dpdk-dev] questions about new offload ethdev api

2019-12-27 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
ollanukkaran > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] questions about new offload ethdev api > > Hi, > > Few comments below. > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 11:39:05AM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > > On 12/10/19 9:07 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > > On 1/23/2018 2:34 PM, Shahaf

Re: [dpdk-dev] questions about new offload ethdev api

2019-12-27 Thread Olivier Matz
Hi, Few comments below. On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 11:39:05AM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > On 12/10/19 9:07 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > On 1/23/2018 2:34 PM, Shahaf Shuler wrote: > >> Tuesday, January 23, 2018 3:53 PM, Olivier Matz: > > > > <...> > > > >>> > >>> 2/ meaning of rxmode.jumbo_fram

Re: [dpdk-dev] questions about new offload ethdev api

2019-12-16 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 12/10/19 9:07 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 1/23/2018 2:34 PM, Shahaf Shuler wrote: >> Tuesday, January 23, 2018 3:53 PM, Olivier Matz: > > <...> > >>> >>> 2/ meaning of rxmode.jumbo_frame, rxmode.enable_scatter, >>> rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len >>> >>> While it's not related to the new API, it is pr

Re: [dpdk-dev] questions about new offload ethdev api

2019-12-10 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 1/23/2018 2:34 PM, Shahaf Shuler wrote: > Tuesday, January 23, 2018 3:53 PM, Olivier Matz: <...> >> >> 2/ meaning of rxmode.jumbo_frame, rxmode.enable_scatter, >> rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len >> >> While it's not related to the new API, it is probably a good opportunity >> to clarify the meaning o

Re: [dpdk-dev] questions about new offload ethdev api

2018-03-08 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 1/23/2018 2:34 PM, Shahaf Shuler wrote: > Tuesday, January 23, 2018 3:53 PM, Olivier Matz: >> Hi, <...> >> 2/ meaning of rxmode.jumbo_frame, rxmode.enable_scatter, >> rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len >> >> While it's not related to the new API, it is probably a good opportunity to >> clarify the meaning

Re: [dpdk-dev] questions about new offload ethdev api

2018-01-23 Thread Shahaf Shuler
Tuesday, January 23, 2018 3:53 PM, Olivier Matz: > Hi, > > I'm currently porting an application to the new ethdev offload api, and I have > two questions about it. > > 1/ inconsistent offload capa for PMDs using the old API? > > It is stated in struct rte_eth_txmode: > >/** > * Per-port

[dpdk-dev] questions about new offload ethdev api

2018-01-23 Thread Olivier Matz
Hi, I'm currently porting an application to the new ethdev offload api, and I have two questions about it. 1/ inconsistent offload capa for PMDs using the old API? It is stated in struct rte_eth_txmode: /** * Per-port Tx offloads to be set using DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_* flags. * Only offload