Re: [dpdk-dev] net/failsafe: add default Tx mbuf fast free capability

2018-12-21 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 14:16:46 +0100 Gaëtan Rivet wrote: > If a VF is forbidden by its PF from adding MAC addresses, the driver > should still advertize support for "Unicast MAC filter" right? Not unless both VF and other path support multiple MAC addresses. Since Hyper-V/Azure is limited to a sin

Re: [dpdk-dev] net/failsafe: add default Tx mbuf fast free capability

2018-12-21 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 12/21/2018 12:12 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 10/12/2018 12:36 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: >> From: Ivan Malov >> >> This capability is reported when supported by the current emitting >> sub-device. Failsafe PMD itself does not excercise fast free logic. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov >> Sign

Re: [dpdk-dev] net/failsafe: add default Tx mbuf fast free capability

2018-12-21 Thread Gaëtan Rivet
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 01:59:20PM +, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 12/21/2018 1:16 PM, Gaëtan Rivet wrote: > > Hi Ferruh, Andrew, > > > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 03:52:07PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > >> Hi Ferruh, > >> > >> On 12/21/18 3:43 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > >>> On 12/21/2018 12:28 P

Re: [dpdk-dev] net/failsafe: add default Tx mbuf fast free capability

2018-12-21 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 12/21/2018 1:16 PM, Gaëtan Rivet wrote: > Hi Ferruh, Andrew, > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 03:52:07PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: >> Hi Ferruh, >> >> On 12/21/18 3:43 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >>> On 12/21/2018 12:28 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: On 12/21/18 3:12 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >

Re: [dpdk-dev] net/failsafe: add default Tx mbuf fast free capability

2018-12-21 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 12/21/2018 12:52 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > Hi Ferruh, > > On 12/21/18 3:43 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >> On 12/21/2018 12:28 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: >>> On 12/21/18 3:12 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: On 10/12/2018 12:36 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > From: Ivan Malov > > This ca

Re: [dpdk-dev] net/failsafe: add default Tx mbuf fast free capability

2018-12-21 Thread Gaëtan Rivet
Hi Ferruh, Andrew, On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 03:52:07PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > Hi Ferruh, > > On 12/21/18 3:43 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > On 12/21/2018 12:28 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > > > On 12/21/18 3:12 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > > > On 10/12/2018 12:36 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:

Re: [dpdk-dev] net/failsafe: add default Tx mbuf fast free capability

2018-12-21 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
Hi Ferruh, On 12/21/18 3:43 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: On 12/21/2018 12:28 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: On 12/21/18 3:12 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: On 10/12/2018 12:36 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: From: Ivan Malov This capability is reported when supported by the current emitting sub-device. Failsa

Re: [dpdk-dev] net/failsafe: add default Tx mbuf fast free capability

2018-12-21 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 12/21/2018 12:28 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > On 12/21/18 3:12 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >> On 10/12/2018 12:36 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: >>> From: Ivan Malov >>> >>> This capability is reported when supported by the current emitting >>> sub-device. Failsafe PMD itself does not excercise fast

Re: [dpdk-dev] net/failsafe: add default Tx mbuf fast free capability

2018-12-21 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 12/21/18 3:12 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: On 10/12/2018 12:36 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: From: Ivan Malov This capability is reported when supported by the current emitting sub-device. Failsafe PMD itself does not excercise fast free logic. I think overlay device capability reporting already

Re: [dpdk-dev] net/failsafe: add default Tx mbuf fast free capability

2018-12-21 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 10/12/2018 12:36 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > From: Ivan Malov > > This capability is reported when supported by the current emitting > sub-device. Failsafe PMD itself does not excercise fast free logic. I think overlay device capability reporting already discussed a few times, the question