[dpdk-dev] mbuff rearm_data aligmenet issue on non x86

2016-05-12 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 01:14:34PM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:07:09AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > > > Hi Jerrin, > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > I would like align mbuff rearm_data field to 8 byte aligned so that > > > > write to mbuf

[dpdk-dev] mbuff rearm_data aligmenet issue on non x86

2016-05-12 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:07:09AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > Hi Jerrin, > > > > > Hi All, > > > > I would like align mbuff rearm_data field to 8 byte aligned so that > > write to mbuf->rearm_data with uint64_t* will be naturally aligned. > > I am not sure about IA but some other archit

[dpdk-dev] mbuff rearm_data aligmenet issue on non x86

2016-05-12 Thread Jerin Jacob
Hi All, I would like align mbuff rearm_data field to 8 byte aligned so that write to mbuf->rearm_data with uint64_t* will be naturally aligned. I am not sure about IA but some other architecture/implementation has overhead in non-naturally aligned stores. Proposed patch is something like this bel

[dpdk-dev] mbuff rearm_data aligmenet issue on non x86

2016-05-12 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
> > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:07:09AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > > Hi Jerrin, > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I would like align mbuff rearm_data field to 8 byte aligned so that > > > write to mbuf->rearm_data with uint64_t* will be naturally aligned. > > > I am not sure about IA but

[dpdk-dev] mbuff rearm_data aligmenet issue on non x86

2016-05-12 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
Hi Jerrin, > > Hi All, > > I would like align mbuff rearm_data field to 8 byte aligned so that > write to mbuf->rearm_data with uint64_t* will be naturally aligned. > I am not sure about IA but some other architecture/implementation has overhead > in non-naturally aligned stores. > > Proposed p