[dpdk-dev] libdpdk upstream changes for ecosystem best practices

2015-09-18 Thread Robie Basak
Hi Thomas, On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 04:18:33PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > First, it would be easier for us to ship a single binary package that > > ships a single shared library to cover all of DPDK that library > > consumers might need, rather than having it split up as you do. I > > unders

[dpdk-dev] libdpdk upstream changes for ecosystem best practices

2015-09-03 Thread Nikita Kozlov
On 09/02/2015 03:49 PM, Robie Basak wrote: > Hi, > > We?re looking at packaging DPDK in Ubuntu. We?d like to discuss upstream > changes to better integrate DPDK into Linux distributions. > ... > > Thanks, > > Robie Hello, For your interest, we have also done some kind of packaging of dpdk for debi

[dpdk-dev] libdpdk upstream changes for ecosystem best practices

2015-09-02 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Hi, 2015-09-02 14:49, Robie Basak: > Hi, > > We?re looking at packaging DPDK in Ubuntu. We?d like to discuss upstream Nice > changes to better integrate DPDK into Linux distributions. Here?s a > summary of what we need: > > 1) Define one library ABI (soname and sover) that we can use instead

[dpdk-dev] libdpdk upstream changes for ecosystem best practices

2015-09-02 Thread Robie Basak
Hi, We?re looking at packaging DPDK in Ubuntu. We?d like to discuss upstream changes to better integrate DPDK into Linux distributions. Here?s a summary of what we need: 1) Define one library ABI (soname and sover) that we can use instead of the split build. 2) Fix #includes so we don't ha

[dpdk-dev] libdpdk upstream changes for ecosystem best practices

2015-09-02 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 02 Sep 2015 16:18:33 +0200 Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi, > > 2015-09-02 14:49, Robie Basak: > > Hi, > > > > We?re looking at packaging DPDK in Ubuntu. We?d like to discuss upstream > > Nice This matches what we do internally. I was heading towards making this a real Debian package. Sin