Hi Thomas,
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 04:18:33PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > First, it would be easier for us to ship a single binary package that
> > ships a single shared library to cover all of DPDK that library
> > consumers might need, rather than having it split up as you do. I
> > unders
On 09/02/2015 03:49 PM, Robie Basak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We?re looking at packaging DPDK in Ubuntu. We?d like to discuss upstream
> changes to better integrate DPDK into Linux distributions.
> ...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Robie
Hello,
For your interest, we have also done some kind of packaging of dpdk for
debi
Hi,
2015-09-02 14:49, Robie Basak:
> Hi,
>
> We?re looking at packaging DPDK in Ubuntu. We?d like to discuss upstream
Nice
> changes to better integrate DPDK into Linux distributions. Here?s a
> summary of what we need:
>
> 1) Define one library ABI (soname and sover) that we can use instead
Hi,
We?re looking at packaging DPDK in Ubuntu. We?d like to discuss upstream
changes to better integrate DPDK into Linux distributions. Here?s a
summary of what we need:
1) Define one library ABI (soname and sover) that we can use instead of the
split build.
2) Fix #includes so we don't ha
On Wed, 02 Sep 2015 16:18:33 +0200
Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2015-09-02 14:49, Robie Basak:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We?re looking at packaging DPDK in Ubuntu. We?d like to discuss upstream
>
> Nice
This matches what we do internally. I was heading towards making this
a real Debian package. Sin
5 matches
Mail list logo